Tools & Wizards About Us
dexaplus.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

dexaplus.com

The DEXA Scanner Provider for Health & Performance - DEXA Plus

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

273 ms

Resources Loaded

859 ms

Page Rendered

192 ms

dexaplus.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to dexaplus.com homepage info - get ready to check DEXA Plus best content right away, or after learning these important things about dexaplus.com

Discover how DEXA Plus helps healthcare providers, wellness centers, and sports teams grow revenue with state-of-the-art DEXA scanners.

Visit dexaplus.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Dexaplus.com page load time and found that the first response time was 273 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

dexaplus.com performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

67/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

26/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

71/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value790 ms

37/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.017

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.2 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

dexaplus.com

273 ms

dexaplus.com

161 ms

style.min.css

30 ms

theme.min.css

45 ms

header-footer.min.css

33 ms

Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Dexaplus.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.userway.org and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (273 ms) belongs to the original domain Dexaplus.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 104.3 kB (22%)

Content Size

479.2 kB

After Optimization

374.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Dexaplus.com main page is 479.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 345.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 94.9 kB

  • Original 116.9 kB
  • After minification 114.1 kB
  • After compression 22.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 94.9 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 8 B

  • Original 14.4 kB
  • After minification 14.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. DEXA Plus images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 9.3 kB

  • Original 345.3 kB
  • After minification 345.3 kB
  • After compression 336.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 19 B

  • Original 2.6 kB
  • After minification 2.6 kB
  • After compression 2.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dexaplus.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (82%)

Requests Now

65

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of DEXA Plus. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

dexaplus.com

dexaplus.com

273 ms

dexaplus.com

dexaplus.com

161 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

30 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

45 ms

header-footer.min.css

header-footer.min.css

33 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

35 ms

post-5.css

post-5.css

35 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

33 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

45 ms

e-swiper.min.css

e-swiper.min.css

49 ms

popup.min.css

popup.min.css

46 ms

post-7.css

post-7.css

52 ms

post-44.css

post-44.css

113 ms

post-48.css

post-48.css

86 ms

post-12597.css

post-12597.css

61 ms

css

css

62 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

56 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

61 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

63 ms

script.min.js

script.min.js

66 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

72 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

69 ms

widget-image.min.css

widget-image.min.css

72 ms

widget-nav-menu.min.css

widget-nav-menu.min.css

78 ms

widget-heading.min.css

widget-heading.min.css

81 ms

widget-spacer.min.css

widget-spacer.min.css

87 ms

widget-text-editor.min.css

widget-text-editor.min.css

84 ms

widget-image-carousel.min.css

widget-image-carousel.min.css

94 ms

widget-video.min.css

widget-video.min.css

97 ms

widget-social-icons.min.css

widget-social-icons.min.css

96 ms

apple-webkit.min.css

apple-webkit.min.css

95 ms

widget-form.min.css

widget-form.min.css

99 ms

21452791.js

21452791.js

100 ms

webfont.js

webfont.js

46 ms

mailoptin.min.js

mailoptin.min.js

152 ms

hello-frontend.min.js

hello-frontend.min.js

107 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

106 ms

api.js

api.js

58 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

150 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

158 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

161 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

158 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

139 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

134 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

135 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

136 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

137 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

118 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

182 ms

widget.js

widget.js

174 ms

banner.js

banner.js

157 ms

collectedforms.js

collectedforms.js

156 ms

conversations-embed.js

conversations-embed.js

174 ms

21452791.js

21452791.js

175 ms

logo-1-1.png

logo-1-1.png

62 ms

orange-plus.png

orange-plus.png

61 ms

wxyz-channel-7-detroit-logo2.png

wxyz-channel-7-detroit-logo2.png

61 ms

the-wall-street-journal-logo-png-5.png

the-wall-street-journal-logo-png-5.png

61 ms

the-doctors-logo2-1.png

the-doctors-logo2-1.png

61 ms

press-logo-today2.png

press-logo-today2.png

61 ms

cnn-logo.png

cnn-logo.png

91 ms

logo-1.png

logo-1.png

147 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

167 ms

font

font

108 ms

font

font

108 ms

eicons.woff

eicons.woff

27 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

86 ms

widget_app_1732693503366.js

widget_app_1732693503366.js

77 ms

widget_lazy.css

widget_lazy.css

11 ms

Accessibility Review

dexaplus.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

dexaplus.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

dexaplus.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dexaplus.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dexaplus.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

dexaplus.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of DEXA Plus. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: