10.7 sec in total
2.3 sec
8.2 sec
150 ms
Welcome to dialreview.com homepage info - get ready to check Dial Review best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about dialreview.com
Your Pre Purchase Solution
Visit dialreview.comWe analyzed Dialreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.3 sec and then it took 8.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
dialreview.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value4.5 s
36/100
25%
Value4.1 s
79/100
10%
Value380 ms
70/100
30%
Value0.078
95/100
15%
Value6.4 s
59/100
10%
2323 ms
22 ms
35 ms
249 ms
500 ms
Our browser made a total of 102 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 46% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Dialreview.com, 10% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.9 sec) relates to the external source I2.wp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 819.2 kB (65%)
1.3 MB
450.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Dialreview.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 554.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 62.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.7 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Dial Review images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 298.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 298.4 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 455.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dialreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 455.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 69 (74%)
93
24
The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dial Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 44 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
dialreview.com
2323 ms
analytics.js
22 ms
css
35 ms
styles.css
249 ms
swipebox.min.css
500 ms
sfsi-style.css
503 ms
yasr.css
510 ms
jquery-ui.css
15 ms
dashicons.min.css
774 ms
yasr-table-light.css
516 ms
style.css
808 ms
responsive.css
746 ms
font-awesome.min.css
751 ms
jetpack.css
763 ms
jquery.js
1032 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
992 ms
jquery.swipebox.min.js
1001 ms
front.js
1016 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
1028 ms
platform.js
71 ms
plusone.js
100 ms
platform.js
110 ms
frontpage.css
1080 ms
lightbox.css
1234 ms
photon.js
1248 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1273 ms
scripts.js
1290 ms
core.min.js
1293 ms
modernizr.custom.min.js
1359 ms
jquery.shuffle.min.js
1482 ms
random-shuffle-min.js
1497 ms
custom.js
1524 ms
jquery.rateit.min.js
1543 ms
yasr-front.js
1544 ms
widget.min.js
1626 ms
progressbar.min.js
1728 ms
position.min.js
1746 ms
tooltip.min.js
1776 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
35 ms
gprofiles.js
78 ms
wpgroho.js
1800 ms
scripts.js
1801 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1895 ms
pie-chart.js
1972 ms
e-201611.js
33 ms
main.js
1994 ms
collect
20 ms
lightbox.min.js
1796 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1610 ms
gs_async.js
218 ms
Elegant-Themes.png
4868 ms
CN2YEO3U8AAwgzW.jpg
2263 ms
hostgator.jpg
1288 ms
Elegant-Themes.png
4222 ms
hostgator.jpg
1215 ms
Dial-Review-Logo.png
1048 ms
sdk.js
271 ms
s-right-s2.png
1115 ms
s-left.png
1144 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlFzCdIATDt8zXO3QNtzVeJ8.ttf
10 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGEBls_1aQwi4AfipSOlE3SU.ttf
25 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGGvd-IutAbwf5FQ8ZpuI2w4.ttf
25 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1949 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
14 ms
widgets.js
63 ms
page
122 ms
close.png
1048 ms
loading.gif
1078 ms
prev.png
1080 ms
next.png
1197 ms
v1_gs_lib-e2a8bc3cf83db1d30114ab643a3fc178.js
12 ms
rs=AGLTcCPAX8LKrZaLueW3YbNkZxb4I97DVQ
6 ms
googlelogo_color_150x54dp.png
75 ms
134 ms
xd_arbiter.php
226 ms
xd_arbiter.php
437 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
29 ms
dtpHsbgPEm2lVWciJZ0P-A.ttf
35 ms
bdHGHleUa-ndQCOrdpfxfw.ttf
40 ms
hovercard.css
40 ms
services.css
124 ms
g.gif
87 ms
page.php
131 ms
hDvwL1_H7g-.css
314 ms
56WNbrUYLbL.css
381 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
515 ms
FJmpeSpHpjS.js
658 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
533 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
533 ms
new_social_buttons.css
36 ms
status
233 ms
getsocial-icons.woff
26 ms
12647356_228267680848114_6317824409836660083_n.png
482 ms
12688030_227838460891036_8846694450424883018_n.png
607 ms
12227225_957714014308347_753444649017010726_n.jpg
723 ms
12118992_536332983191351_7153671138962092904_n.jpg
765 ms
12072815_704407073027280_8145699483108051686_n.jpg
735 ms
10354686_10150004552801856_220367501106153455_n.jpg
700 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
80 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
79 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
69 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
137 ms
dialreview.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
dialreview.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
dialreview.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dialreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dialreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
dialreview.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Dial Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: