Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 47

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    67% of websites

dianwall.com

超碰97人人网人人澡青青色_超碰97人人让你爽总站_超碰97人人公开_超碰97青青久久人人澡,大臿蕉香蕉大视频中文字,色偷偷AV男人的天堂京东热,一本大道香蕉一区二区,大香伊蕉在人线国产2019

Page Load Speed

31.7 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

25.6 sec

Page Rendered

5 sec

dianwall.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Dianwall content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about dianwall.com

超碰97人人网人人澡青青色_超碰97人人让你爽总站_超碰97人人公开_超碰97青青久久人人澡,大臿蕉香蕉大视频中文字,色偷偷AV男人的天堂京东热,一本大道香蕉一区二区,大香伊蕉在人线国产2019,久久国产擦,中文字幕免费久久99,久久一热久久这里只有精品图片

Visit dianwall.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Dianwall.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 30.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 2 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

dianwall.com performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value46.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

49/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.156

74/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value34.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

index.php

1166 ms

css.css

204 ms

style.css

157 ms

animate.css

168 ms

public.css

174 ms

Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (89 requests) were addressed to the original Dianwall.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Js.users.51.la and 1% (1 request) were made to Push.zhanzhang.baidu.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.4 sec) relates to the external source Js.users.51.la.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 938.6 kB (4%)

Content Size

25.5 MB

After Optimization

24.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Dianwall.com main page is 25.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 25.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 95.6 kB

  • Original 114.3 kB
  • After minification 91.9 kB
  • After compression 18.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 22.4 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 95.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 840.8 kB

  • Original 25.4 MB
  • After minification 24.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Dianwall images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 112 B

  • Original 437 B
  • After minification 431 B
  • After compression 325 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 112 B or 26% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 21.8 kB
  • After minification 21.8 kB
  • After compression 19.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dianwall.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (6%)

Requests Now

89

After Optimization

84

The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dianwall. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

dianwall.com accessibility score

47

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

dianwall.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

dianwall.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dianwall.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Dianwall.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Dianwall. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: