9.6 sec in total
3.9 sec
5.4 sec
235 ms
Click here to check amazing Didsomeonesaychocolate content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about didsomeonesaychocolate.com
didsomeonesaychocolate.com is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, didsomeonesaychocolate.com ha...
Visit didsomeonesaychocolate.comWe analyzed Didsomeonesaychocolate.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3.9 sec and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
didsomeonesaychocolate.com performance score
3949 ms
127 ms
128 ms
127 ms
6 ms
Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Didsomeonesaychocolate.com, 34% (12 requests) were made to Bluehost.com and 11% (4 requests) were made to C.rmgserving.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Didsomeonesaychocolate.com.
Page size can be reduced by 103.1 kB (49%)
210.2 kB
107.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Didsomeonesaychocolate.com main page is 210.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 126.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.5 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Didsomeonesaychocolate needs image optimization as it can save up to 10.7 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 72.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 72.3 kB or 57% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Didsomeonesaychocolate.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 16.6 kB or 74% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (33%)
27
18
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Didsomeonesaychocolate. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
didsomeonesaychocolate.com
3949 ms
home.css
127 ms
main.css
128 ms
cookies.js
127 ms
registrar.js
6 ms
jquery.min.js
127 ms
home.css
301 ms
main.css
302 ms
cookies.js
330 ms
jquery.min.js
393 ms
hp_sprite.gif
94 ms
logo.jpg
94 ms
header_grad.jpg
93 ms
ga.js
17 ms
logo.jpg
68 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
show_afd_ads.js
17 ms
collect
54 ms
domainpark.cgi
37 ms
dsregredir.com
494 ms
ga-audiences
35 ms
__utm.gif
6 ms
px.js
61 ms
px.js
65 ms
caf.js
53 ms
newcafv2.js
5 ms
body-bg.gif
54 ms
header-bg.jpg
52 ms
logo1.png
51 ms
caf.gif
45 ms
slave.html
14 ms
domainpark.cgi
169 ms
frst_arr.jpg
8 ms
last_arr.jpg
8 ms
arrow-4.png
15 ms
didsomeonesaychocolate.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Didsomeonesaychocolate.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Didsomeonesaychocolate.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
didsomeonesaychocolate.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Didsomeonesaychocolate. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: