5.4 sec in total
1.1 sec
3.5 sec
826 ms
Click here to check amazing Didtheycheat content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about didtheycheat.com
Bust a Cheater !!! How to Catch your Cheating Spouse, partner husband wife BF GF? Do you want to find out if your husband is cheating by phone or email ? OR are you a man whose wife is caught up in an...
Visit didtheycheat.comWe analyzed Didtheycheat.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
didtheycheat.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
81/100
10%
Value7.9 s
3/100
25%
Value10.8 s
6/100
10%
Value4,820 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.568
12/100
15%
Value18.7 s
3/100
10%
1122 ms
141 ms
153 ms
178 ms
159 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Didtheycheat.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Didtheycheat.com.
Page size can be reduced by 111.9 kB (5%)
2.1 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Didtheycheat.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 88.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.1 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Didtheycheat images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Didtheycheat.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (82%)
77
14
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Didtheycheat. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
didtheycheat.com
1122 ms
style.min.css
141 ms
oxygen.css
153 ms
um-modal.min.css
178 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
159 ms
tipsy.min.css
147 ms
um-raty.min.css
174 ms
fonticons-ii.min.css
274 ms
fonticons-fa.min.css
280 ms
select2.min.css
286 ms
um-fileupload.min.css
300 ms
default.min.css
310 ms
default.date.min.css
307 ms
default.time.min.css
418 ms
common.min.css
425 ms
um-responsive.min.css
414 ms
um-styles.min.css
434 ms
cropper.min.css
450 ms
um-profile.min.css
437 ms
um-account.min.css
538 ms
um-misc.min.css
554 ms
um-old-default.min.css
552 ms
jquery.min.js
614 ms
um-gdpr.min.js
590 ms
adsbygoogle.js
87 ms
adsbygoogle.js
122 ms
amp-auto-ads-0.1.js
65 ms
js
88 ms
127050.css
589 ms
126998.css
709 ms
universal.css
709 ms
aos.css
716 ms
underscore.min.js
757 ms
wp-util.min.js
760 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
760 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
918 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
921 ms
hooks.min.js
919 ms
i18n.min.js
920 ms
tipsy.min.js
922 ms
beacon.min.js
136 ms
picker.min.js
921 ms
picker.date.min.js
783 ms
picker.time.min.js
843 ms
common.min.js
842 ms
cropper.min.js
873 ms
common-frontend.min.js
835 ms
um-modal.min.js
831 ms
jquery-form.min.js
746 ms
fileupload.js
837 ms
um-functions.min.js
842 ms
um-responsive.min.js
833 ms
um-conditional.min.js
833 ms
select2.full.min.js
882 ms
en.js
752 ms
um-raty.min.js
826 ms
um-scripts.min.js
831 ms
um-profile.min.js
836 ms
um-account.min.js
834 ms
aos.js
849 ms
gtm.js
80 ms
show_ads_impl.js
111 ms
zrt_lookup.html
84 ms
Logo-W@2x.png
210 ms
DTC-NEW-LOGO-2019-Thin-Header-transp.png
637 ms
didtheycheat-he-cheated-and-now-he-is-screwed-find-out-why.jpg
666 ms
verb-commodity.gif
1569 ms
js
59 ms
analytics.js
52 ms
this-cant-be-good-didtheycheat-login-page.jpg
696 ms
world-gym-london-canada-fitness-tracker-cheating-spouse-didtheycheat-site.jpg
664 ms
SIssy-Steven-Reichenberg-Dog-Slut-and-K9-Sex-Slave.jpg
779 ms
Justin-Smith-Vancouver-2-scaled.jpg
889 ms
received_1170449324360820.jpeg
742 ms
collect
110 ms
ads
900 ms
collect
18 ms
main.js
10 ms
reactive_library.js
129 ms
didtheycheat.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
didtheycheat.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
didtheycheat.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Didtheycheat.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Didtheycheat.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
didtheycheat.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Didtheycheat. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: