3.7 sec in total
333 ms
3.1 sec
294 ms
Welcome to digigram.com homepage info - get ready to check Digigram best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about digigram.com
Capture, production and delivery of high-quality audio for professionals - Audio over IP codecs - Sound cards - Cloud
Visit digigram.comWe analyzed Digigram.com page load time and found that the first response time was 333 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
digigram.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
56/100
10%
Value2.8 s
83/100
25%
Value9.4 s
13/100
10%
Value3,550 ms
2/100
30%
Value1.02
2/100
15%
Value16.8 s
5/100
10%
333 ms
1877 ms
178 ms
182 ms
186 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Digigram.com, 81% (57 requests) were made to Cdn.digigram.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Digigram.com.
Page size can be reduced by 524.8 kB (30%)
1.8 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Digigram.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 985.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 42.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Digigram images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 388.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 388.7 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 72.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Digigram.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 72.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (73%)
66
18
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Digigram. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
digigram.com
333 ms
www.digigram.com
1877 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
178 ms
um-recaptcha.css
182 ms
cli-style.css
186 ms
font-awesome.min.css
193 ms
bootstrap.css
204 ms
front.css
188 ms
mappress.css
226 ms
css
42 ms
style.css
197 ms
style.css
196 ms
um.min.css
214 ms
style.css
232 ms
css
39 ms
minimal.css
229 ms
jquery.min.js
229 ms
compat.min.js
228 ms
api.js
56 ms
cookielawinfo.js
228 ms
bootstrap.min.js
275 ms
front.js
283 ms
chosen.jquery.min.js
282 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
284 ms
modernizr.custom.min.js
281 ms
jquery.form.min.js
204 ms
idle-timer.min.js
247 ms
custom.js
249 ms
frontend.min.js
251 ms
masonry.min.js
250 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
248 ms
um.min.js
257 ms
jquery.infieldLabel.min.js
249 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
251 ms
jquery.mmenu.min.all.js
253 ms
picturefill.min.js
250 ms
scripts.min.js
251 ms
icheck.min.js
252 ms
enquire.min.js
253 ms
wp-embed.min.js
254 ms
jquery.json.js
253 ms
gravityforms.min.js
163 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
157 ms
css
40 ms
recaptcha__en.js
121 ms
blu-by-digigram-logo-menu.png
206 ms
mtracking.gif
633 ms
digigram_print.gif
72 ms
digigram.png
70 ms
gtm.js
191 ms
img-home.png
49 ms
triangle-slide-left.png
45 ms
triangle-slide-right.png
46 ms
digigram_solutions-capture-2.png
47 ms
digigram_solutions-capture-3.png
75 ms
digigram_solutions-deliver-and-share-2.png
51 ms
solutions-industrial-digigram-vignette.jpg
49 ms
ibc-2017-e1503391713234.jpg
48 ms
AUDIOWAY-BRIDGE-strict-front-1.png
74 ms
home_block_4_left.png
49 ms
home_block_4_right.png
51 ms
footer-newsletter-desktop.png
50 ms
footer_left.png
30 ms
footer_right.png
31 ms
aux-font.woff
210 ms
signature_footer.png
7 ms
overlay.png
96 ms
analytics.js
25 ms
collect
11 ms
collect
50 ms
digigram.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
digigram.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
digigram.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Digigram.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Digigram.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
digigram.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Digigram. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: