2.6 sec in total
31 ms
2.5 sec
82 ms
Click here to check amazing Digitalpost content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about digitalpost.org
digitalpost.org is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, digitalpost.org has it all. We hope you ...
Visit digitalpost.orgWe analyzed Digitalpost.org page load time and found that the first response time was 31 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
digitalpost.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
58/100
10%
Value4.2 s
44/100
25%
Value4.7 s
69/100
10%
Value1,800 ms
10/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.5 s
31/100
10%
31 ms
1175 ms
57 ms
89 ms
37 ms
Our browser made a total of 15 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 13% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Digitalpost.org, 40% (6 requests) were made to Blogblog.com and 20% (3 requests) were made to Blogger.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Digitalpost.org.
Page size can be reduced by 364.3 kB (47%)
768.2 kB
403.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Digitalpost.org main page is 768.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 708.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.3 kB or 55% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 336.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 336.0 kB or 47% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Digitalpost.org has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (69%)
13
4
The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Digitalpost. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
digitalpost.org
31 ms
www.digitalpost.org
1175 ms
3375562265-css_bundle_v2.css
57 ms
authorization.css
89 ms
jquery.js
37 ms
jquery-mousewheel.js
42 ms
common.js
59 ms
magazine.js
58 ms
gadgets.js
54 ms
comments.js
57 ms
3226477086-widgets.js
57 ms
plusone.js
84 ms
ga.js
7 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
35 ms
__utm.gif
19 ms
digitalpost.org accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
digitalpost.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
digitalpost.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Digitalpost.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Digitalpost.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
digitalpost.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Digitalpost. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: