10 sec in total
1.8 sec
7.9 sec
421 ms
Welcome to digitalswot.com homepage info - get ready to check Digital Swot best content for Pakistan right away, or after learning these important things about digitalswot.com
Digital Swot globally recognized digital marketing agency in Canada and Pakistan specializes in Internet Marketing, Digital Marketing, SEO.
Visit digitalswot.comWe analyzed Digitalswot.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 8.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
digitalswot.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.5 s
0/100
10%
Value12.4 s
0/100
25%
Value15.6 s
0/100
10%
Value1,450 ms
15/100
30%
Value0.068
96/100
15%
Value18.2 s
3/100
10%
1769 ms
470 ms
965 ms
715 ms
723 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Digitalswot.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Digitalswot.com.
Page size can be reduced by 3.7 MB (76%)
4.9 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Digitalswot.com main page is 4.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 81.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 81.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Digital Swot images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.3 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.3 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Digitalswot.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.3 MB or 92% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (68%)
74
24
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Digital Swot. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.digitalswot.com
1769 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
470 ms
style.min.css
965 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
715 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
723 ms
styles.css
737 ms
wpcdt-public.css
739 ms
css
27 ms
css
40 ms
all.min.css
1245 ms
animate-custom.css
950 ms
foundation.min.css
1677 ms
app.css
2704 ms
style.css
987 ms
slick.min.css
1186 ms
slick-theme.min.css
1209 ms
lightbox.min.css
1233 ms
js_composer.min.css
2596 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1457 ms
frontend.min.css
1724 ms
lightbox.min.css
1493 ms
galleria.mediagrid.css
1704 ms
lc-micro-slider.min.css
1744 ms
custom.css
1916 ms
jetpack.css
1952 ms
jquery.min.js
2217 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1994 ms
js
89 ms
js_composer_tta.min.css
2659 ms
vc_linecons_icons.min.css
1983 ms
index.js
2027 ms
index.js
2230 ms
api.js
45 ms
comment-reply.min.js
2246 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
2276 ms
wd-script.min.js
3220 ms
api.js
71 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
2600 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
2600 ms
index.js
2623 ms
frontend.js
2761 ms
e-202409.js
23 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
2986 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
2566 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
2357 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
2404 ms
vc-accordion.min.js
2465 ms
vc-tta-autoplay.min.js
2510 ms
forms.js
2357 ms
Repeat-Grid-47-5.png
54 ms
logo.png
582 ms
search-icon.svg
734 ms
Repeat-Grid-47.png
735 ms
ellipse-bg.png
734 ms
USAID-300x103.png
800 ms
395x136-1-300x103.png
862 ms
SindhGov-300x103.png
912 ms
Voizar-300x147.jpeg
917 ms
MaidInPakistan-300x103.png
922 ms
KFBH-300x103.png
969 ms
PakinaTechnologies-300x103.png
1001 ms
GreenPakistan.png
1060 ms
paktales-1-300x147.jpg
1158 ms
Shakzee-300x103.png
1161 ms
7seas-educational-services-300x103.png
1169 ms
ijeeet.png
1221 ms
BennaMedia-300x103.png
1238 ms
watanNews-1.png
1301 ms
dali-creations-300x103.jpg
1406 ms
urdu-pure-300x103.jpg
1407 ms
footerpng.png
1416 ms
font
39 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1680 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1432 ms
web-animations.min.js
1499 ms
js
83 ms
analytics.js
78 ms
vc_linecons.woff
1494 ms
recaptcha__en.js
48 ms
collect
74 ms
digitalswot.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
digitalswot.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
digitalswot.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Digitalswot.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Digitalswot.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
digitalswot.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Digital Swot. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: