Tools & Wizards About Us
digitalvisitor.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 79

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

digitalvisitor.com

Navigate | Award Winning Consultancy | Growing Income & Impact

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

256 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

855 ms

digitalvisitor.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to digitalvisitor.com homepage info - get ready to check Digitalvisitor best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about digitalvisitor.com

Navigate is an award-winning consultancy with a track record of growing visitors, income and impact for positive-impact tourism brands.

Visit digitalvisitor.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Digitalvisitor.com page load time and found that the first response time was 256 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

digitalvisitor.com performance score

79

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

73/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

90/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.2 s

20/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value250 ms

84/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.011

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.2 s

74/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

digitalvisitor.com

256 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

181 ms

ajax-load-more.min.css

217 ms

styles.css

211 ms

css

25 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 18% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Digitalvisitor.com, 69% (43 requests) were made to A1f875362c7acf549e2003fd.digitalvisitor.netdna-cdn.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source A1f875362c7acf549e2003fd.digitalvisitor.netdna-cdn.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 864.5 kB (32%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Digitalvisitor.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 31.4 kB

  • Original 40.1 kB
  • After minification 37.7 kB
  • After compression 8.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.4 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 24.3 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Digitalvisitor images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 674.9 kB

  • Original 944.1 kB
  • After minification 758.8 kB
  • After compression 269.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 674.9 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 133.9 kB

  • Original 151.1 kB
  • After minification 118.4 kB
  • After compression 17.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Digitalvisitor.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 133.9 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (48%)

Requests Now

60

After Optimization

31

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Digitalvisitor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

digitalvisitor.com

digitalvisitor.com

256 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

181 ms

ajax-load-more.min.css

ajax-load-more.min.css

217 ms

styles.css

styles.css

211 ms

css

css

25 ms

checkbox.min.css

checkbox.min.css

213 ms

wpgform.css

wpgform.css

214 ms

form.min.css

form.min.css

208 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

288 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

372 ms

css

css

35 ms

master.css

master.css

370 ms

animate.css

animate.css

385 ms

slicknav.css

slicknav.css

380 ms

style.css

style.css

381 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

542 ms

jquery-ui.js

jquery-ui.js

781 ms

jquery.prettynumber.js

jquery.prettynumber.js

536 ms

jquery.number.js

jquery.number.js

538 ms

jquery.slicknav.js

jquery.slicknav.js

539 ms

global.js

global.js

540 ms

placeholders.min.js

placeholders.min.js

696 ms

js

js

23 ms

jquery.ui.map.js

jquery.ui.map.js

698 ms

maplace-0.1.3.min.js

maplace-0.1.3.min.js

705 ms

jquery.fittext.js

jquery.fittext.js

705 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

7 ms

collect

collect

28 ms

collect

collect

67 ms

jquery.nicescroll.min.js

jquery.nicescroll.min.js

255 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

176 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

95 ms

dots.png

dots.png

169 ms

animatedlogo.gif

animatedlogo.gif

173 ms

DV_LOGO.png

DV_LOGO.png

182 ms

pattern.png

pattern.png

180 ms

arrow21.png

arrow21.png

190 ms

chevron.png

chevron.png

191 ms

drum_logo.png

drum_logo.png

274 ms

bima_member_button_black.png

bima_member_button_black.png

340 ms

footer_icons_.png

footer_icons_.png

347 ms

social-media-agency-bristol-uk.jpg

social-media-agency-bristol-uk.jpg

329 ms

social-media-agency-uk.jpg

social-media-agency-uk.jpg

407 ms

social-media-marketing-agency-uk.jpg

social-media-marketing-agency-uk.jpg

406 ms

barbour-social-media-fashion-campaign.jpg

barbour-social-media-fashion-campaign.jpg

420 ms

accorhotels-social-media-campaign.jpg

accorhotels-social-media-campaign.jpg

462 ms

john-fowler-holidays-case-study-2015.jpg

john-fowler-holidays-case-study-2015.jpg

529 ms

voyages-to-antiquity-case-study.jpg

voyages-to-antiquity-case-study.jpg

742 ms

catalunya-social-media-campaign-2015.jpg

catalunya-social-media-campaign-2015.jpg

1053 ms

social_icons_social_dark.png

social_icons_social_dark.png

579 ms

social_icons_influencer_dark.png

social_icons_influencer_dark.png

663 ms

social_icons_leads_dark.png

social_icons_leads_dark.png

622 ms

social_icons_seo_dark.png

social_icons_seo_dark.png

687 ms

social-media-targeting-for-tour-operators.jpg

social-media-targeting-for-tour-operators.jpg

579 ms

luxury-product-marketing.jpg

luxury-product-marketing.jpg

912 ms

seo-strategies-for-link-building.jpg

seo-strategies-for-link-building.jpg

952 ms

digital-trends-2016.jpg

digital-trends-2016.jpg

1073 ms

revlon-professional-social-media.jpg

revlon-professional-social-media.jpg

935 ms

footer_dv_logo.jpg

footer_dv_logo.jpg

981 ms

zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf

12 ms

mobile.css

mobile.css

181 ms

mobile_364.css

mobile_364.css

168 ms

Accessibility Review

digitalvisitor.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

digitalvisitor.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

digitalvisitor.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Digitalvisitor.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Digitalvisitor.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

digitalvisitor.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Digitalvisitor. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: