4.4 sec in total
587 ms
3.6 sec
255 ms
Visit digitraffic.fi now to see the best up-to-date Digitraffic content for Finland and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about digitraffic.fi
Visit digitraffic.fiWe analyzed Digitraffic.fi page load time and found that the first response time was 587 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
digitraffic.fi performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
64/100
10%
Value6.5 s
9/100
25%
Value3.0 s
94/100
10%
Value30 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.005
100/100
15%
Value4.1 s
86/100
10%
587 ms
324 ms
687 ms
434 ms
218 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Digitraffic.fi, 77% (37 requests) were made to Liikennevirasto.fi and 4% (2 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (857 ms) relates to the external source Weathercam.digitraffic.fi.
Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (70%)
2.5 MB
755.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Digitraffic.fi main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 385.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 169.2 kB, which is 39% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 385.8 kB or 90% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Digitraffic images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 905.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 905.2 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 491.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Digitraffic.fi needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 491.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (70%)
40
12
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Digitraffic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
digitraffic.fi
587 ms
Digitraffic
324 ms
Digitraffic
687 ms
digitraffic
434 ms
aui.css
218 ms
main.css
321 ms
main.css
215 ms
main.css
476 ms
barebone.jsp
662 ms
main.js
213 ms
main.js
330 ms
main.css
537 ms
jquery-1.11.3.min.js
435 ms
jquery.sticky.js
426 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
428 ms
jquery.dotdotdot.min.js
533 ms
jquery.nanogallery.min.js
763 ms
select2.min.js
547 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
584 ms
localization.js
638 ms
header.js
643 ms
newsletter.js
652 ms
nanogallery.js
760 ms
init.js
761 ms
addthis_widget.js
10 ms
main.js
677 ms
C0150201.jpg
857 ms
liikennevirasto_logo_2x.png
160 ms
8d4369dc-3b89-4dbe-a581-db811a142208
358 ms
08dcec04-05ac-4308-8321-7533b3608636
160 ms
gtm.js
159 ms
7b5b6558-ecc7-473f-8e13-a9f6af5efe22.woff
214 ms
f9e67ab9-8414-4b80-b50b-1f2acb9f9d8a.woff
315 ms
c4e5744a-7368-4163-8be6-4ee1fa7f44a3.woff
240 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
325 ms
digitraffic
161 ms
digitraffic
231 ms
88x31.png
103 ms
280 ms
300lo.json
73 ms
analytics.js
7 ms
sh.953eb77977227bfd253ee158.html
48 ms
collect
54 ms
collect
66 ms
109 ms
108 ms
available_languages.jsp
116 ms
116 ms
digitraffic.fi accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
digitraffic.fi best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Page has valid source maps
digitraffic.fi SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
FI
FI
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Digitraffic.fi can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Finnish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Digitraffic.fi main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
digitraffic.fi
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Digitraffic. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: