Tools & Wizards About Us
dingman.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    45% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 94

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

dingman.com

The Dingman Company – Connecting Christian Leadership Excellence with Opportunity

Page Load Speed

5.5 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

331 ms

dingman.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to dingman.com homepage info - get ready to check Dingman best content right away, or after learning these important things about dingman.com

Executive Search Consulting and Leadership Recruiting for Non-Profit, Higher Education, K-12 Education, Churches and other Faith-Based Organizations.

Visit dingman.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Dingman.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

dingman.com performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.7 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value980 ms

28/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.109

87/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.6 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

dingman.com

1289 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

116 ms

formidableforms.css

195 ms

style.min.css

303 ms

style.css

231 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Dingman.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Intelliclicksoftware.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Dingman.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 195.4 kB (4%)

Content Size

4.5 MB

After Optimization

4.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Dingman.com main page is 4.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 54.4 kB

  • Original 67.6 kB
  • After minification 67.2 kB
  • After compression 13.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 3.9 MB
  • After minification 3.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Dingman images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 129.6 kB

  • Original 470.9 kB
  • After minification 470.9 kB
  • After compression 341.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 129.6 kB or 28% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 9.0 kB

  • Original 57.9 kB
  • After minification 55.2 kB
  • After compression 48.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dingman.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.0 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (70%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dingman. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

dingman.com

dingman.com

1289 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

116 ms

formidableforms.css

formidableforms.css

195 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

303 ms

style.css

style.css

231 ms

style.css

style.css

229 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

229 ms

main.css

main.css

230 ms

gp_custom_forms.css

gp_custom_forms.css

270 ms

rateit.css

rateit.css

306 ms

styles.css

styles.css

305 ms

css

css

46 ms

mai-theme.min.css

mai-theme.min.css

379 ms

flexington.min.css

flexington.min.css

306 ms

style.css

style.css

346 ms

smartslider.min.css

smartslider.min.css

377 ms

main.js

main.js

385 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

457 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

385 ms

GetResource.aspx

GetResource.aspx

199 ms

n2.min.js

n2.min.js

422 ms

smartslider-frontend.min.js

smartslider-frontend.min.js

455 ms

ss-simple.min.js

ss-simple.min.js

454 ms

smartslider-backgroundanimation.min.js

smartslider-backgroundanimation.min.js

456 ms

w-bullet.min.js

w-bullet.min.js

478 ms

gp_custom_forms.js

gp_custom_forms.js

502 ms

before_and_after_fe.js

before_and_after_fe.js

530 ms

index.js

index.js

533 ms

index.js

index.js

532 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

534 ms

superfish.min.js

superfish.min.js

534 ms

skip-links.min.js

skip-links.min.js

574 ms

mai-theme.min.js

mai-theme.min.js

607 ms

basic-scroll.min.js

basic-scroll.min.js

623 ms

mai-scroll.min.js

mai-scroll.min.js

624 ms

fitvids.min.js

fitvids.min.js

625 ms

fitvids-init.min.js

fitvids-init.min.js

625 ms

api.js

api.js

49 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

652 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

675 ms

index.js

index.js

597 ms

Logo-with-byline-2021-1.jpg

Logo-with-byline-2021-1.jpg

248 ms

Dingman_slider_6.jpg

Dingman_slider_6.jpg

441 ms

Dingman_slider_9.jpg

Dingman_slider_9.jpg

439 ms

Dingman_slider_8.jpg

Dingman_slider_8.jpg

408 ms

Slider-4-2.jpg

Slider-4-2.jpg

586 ms

Slider-3-2.jpg

Slider-3-2.jpg

661 ms

Slider-2-2.jpg

Slider-2-2.jpg

516 ms

Slider-5.jpg

Slider-5.jpg

560 ms

Dingman_slider_5.jpg

Dingman_slider_5.jpg

591 ms

Dingman_slider_7.jpg

Dingman_slider_7.jpg

518 ms

Client-Connection-Button.jpg

Client-Connection-Button.jpg

593 ms

Dingman-Our-Advantage.jpg

Dingman-Our-Advantage.jpg

596 ms

dingman_our_values.jpg

dingman_our_values.jpg

637 ms

Dingman-benefits.jpg

Dingman-benefits.jpg

663 ms

Butler.woff

Butler.woff

636 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

26 ms

click.aspx

click.aspx

815 ms

Accessibility Review

dingman.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

dingman.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

dingman.com SEO score

94

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dingman.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dingman.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

dingman.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Dingman. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: