Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

Page Load Speed

22.8 sec in total

First Response

1.5 sec

Resources Loaded

20.7 sec

Page Rendered

562 ms

directorydiscussion.com screenshot

About Website

Visit directorydiscussion.com now to see the best up-to-date Directorydiscussion content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about directorydiscussion.com

One of the best directory for one way linking. Submit your link for free

Visit directorydiscussion.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Directorydiscussion.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 21.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

directorydiscussion.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

17/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.5 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value950 ms

29/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.161

73/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.5 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

directorydiscussion.com

1546 ms

style.css

583 ms

style.css

585 ms

jquery.js

910 ms

sessvars.js

579 ms

Our browser made a total of 194 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 23% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Directorydiscussion.com, 13% (26 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 12% (23 requests) were made to Maps.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (18.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Directorydiscussion.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 544.7 kB (33%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Directorydiscussion.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 941.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 78.2 kB

  • Original 93.1 kB
  • After minification 87.4 kB
  • After compression 14.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 111.2 kB

  • Original 941.2 kB
  • After minification 830.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Directorydiscussion needs image optimization as it can save up to 111.2 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 327.8 kB

  • Original 566.9 kB
  • After minification 544.9 kB
  • After compression 239.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 327.8 kB or 58% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 27.6 kB

  • Original 34.1 kB
  • After minification 25.4 kB
  • After compression 6.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Directorydiscussion.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 27.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 109 (59%)

Requests Now

185

After Optimization

76

The browser has sent 185 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Directorydiscussion. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 71 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

directorydiscussion.com accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

directorydiscussion.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

directorydiscussion.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Directorydiscussion.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Directorydiscussion.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Directorydiscussion. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: