3.7 sec in total
76 ms
3.3 sec
279 ms
Click here to check amazing Discussing Design content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about discussingdesign.com
Paying attention to the details of design critique
Visit discussingdesign.comWe analyzed Discussingdesign.com page load time and found that the first response time was 76 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
discussingdesign.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
27/100
10%
Value5.0 s
26/100
25%
Value9.0 s
14/100
10%
Value60 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value5.0 s
77/100
10%
76 ms
1441 ms
13 ms
12 ms
52 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Discussingdesign.com, 15% (7 requests) were made to Farm9.staticflickr.com and 9% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Discussingdesign.com.
Page size can be reduced by 242.3 kB (57%)
424.0 kB
181.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Discussingdesign.com main page is 424.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 185.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.0 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Discussing Design images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 115.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 115.1 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 93.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Discussingdesign.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 93.9 kB or 93% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (51%)
37
18
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Discussing Design. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
discussingdesign.com
76 ms
www.discussingdesign.com
1441 ms
style.css
13 ms
widget.css
12 ms
layout.css
52 ms
async-share.css
53 ms
generator.php
54 ms
jquery.js
58 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
54 ms
third-party.js
57 ms
slides.min.jquery.js
54 ms
feedback.js
55 ms
general.js
56 ms
css
95 ms
shortcodes.css
87 ms
custom.css
90 ms
galleria.classic.js
1301 ms
galleria.classic.css
1540 ms
adpacks.js
91 ms
badge_code_v2.gne
136 ms
async-share.js
86 ms
wp-embed.min.js
86 ms
ga.js
82 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
50 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
dd1-150x150.png
4 ms
IMG_9867-100x100.gif
4 ms
adam-aaron1-100x100.jpg
5 ms
F6AIK5T.json
250 ms
white_texture.png
34 ms
8016519957_037cc8235b_s.jpg
109 ms
8169746600_5f0b3bf6d1_s.jpg
111 ms
p
106 ms
8016521445_706cdf0789_s.jpg
114 ms
8016524742_f8a56bb5e8_s.jpg
110 ms
8016521671_8ea27b13e3_s.jpg
107 ms
8169747120_4ba8d1f41d_s.jpg
112 ms
8016519893_a88c35962e_s.jpg
108 ms
8016521341_be3fe071b9_s.jpg
111 ms
8169719713_22d241ffbe_s.jpg
110 ms
46aYWdgz-1oFX11flmyEfZS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf
101 ms
NbE6ykYuM2IyEwxQxOIi2P83cGrqhiQgWmjXfohD0fc.ttf
101 ms
websymbols-regular-webfont.woff
105 ms
s-BiyweUPV0v-yRb-cjciMDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
101 ms
EFpQQyG9GqCrobXxL-KRMcBaWKZ57bY3RXgXH6dOjZ0.ttf
101 ms
__utm.gif
97 ms
discussingdesign.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
discussingdesign.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
discussingdesign.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Discussingdesign.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Discussingdesign.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
discussingdesign.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Discussing Design. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: