Tools & Wizards About Us
dive.site screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

dive.site

dive.site - Interactive dive site map and online logbook for divers

Page Load Speed

14.6 sec in total

First Response

6.1 sec

Resources Loaded

8.3 sec

Page Rendered

183 ms

dive.site screenshot

About Website

Visit dive.site now to see the best up-to-date Dive content for Egypt and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about dive.site

dive.site is an interactive map for divers, with the best dive spots worldwide. Share your diving experiences & keep track of your dives online!

Visit dive.site

Key Findings

We analyzed Dive.site page load time and found that the first response time was 6.1 sec and then it took 8.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

dive.site performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.4 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value270 ms

82/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.8 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

dive.site

6083 ms

gtm.js

84 ms

css2

49 ms

css

66 ms

leaflet.min.css

128 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Dive.site, 11% (6 requests) were made to S3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.userreport.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Dive.site.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 531.4 kB (16%)

Content Size

3.3 MB

After Optimization

2.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Dive.site main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 184.3 kB

  • Original 211.3 kB
  • After minification 185.8 kB
  • After compression 27.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 25.5 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 184.3 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 344.9 kB

  • Original 2.8 MB
  • After minification 2.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Dive needs image optimization as it can save up to 344.9 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.2 kB

  • Original 304.6 kB
  • After minification 304.6 kB
  • After compression 302.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 33 B

  • Original 19.6 kB
  • After minification 19.6 kB
  • After compression 19.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dive.site has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (74%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dive. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

dive.site

dive.site

6083 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

84 ms

css2

css2

49 ms

css

css

66 ms

leaflet.min.css

leaflet.min.css

128 ms

markercluster.min.css

markercluster.min.css

247 ms

select2.min.css

select2.min.css

382 ms

select2-bootstrap.min.css

select2-bootstrap.min.css

384 ms

bootstrap-datetimepicker.min.css

bootstrap-datetimepicker.min.css

383 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

518 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

512 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

366 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

487 ms

regular.min.css

regular.min.css

497 ms

sass.css

sass.css

620 ms

s.css

s.css

498 ms

index.css

index.css

611 ms

es6-promise.auto.min.js

es6-promise.auto.min.js

619 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

743 ms

custom.js

custom.js

639 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

638 ms

user-report.js

user-report.js

730 ms

main.js

main.js

729 ms

leaflet.min.js

leaflet.min.js

863 ms

markercluster.min.js

markercluster.min.js

769 ms

leaflet-heat-modified.min.js

leaflet-heat-modified.min.js

769 ms

leaflet-google-mutant.min.js

leaflet-google-mutant.min.js

847 ms

map.js

map.js

857 ms

select2.full.min.js

select2.full.min.js

859 ms

moment.min.js

moment.min.js

886 ms

bootstrap-datetimepicker.min.js

bootstrap-datetimepicker.min.js

892 ms

stars.js

stars.js

961 ms

js

js

97 ms

userreport.js

userreport.js

24 ms

settings.js

settings.js

303 ms

main.js

main.js

43 ms

23de7c4e80156e07461e2c5c06825930.png

23de7c4e80156e07461e2c5c06825930.png

953 ms

6371b75628b4bae672474e08da8dab4d.png

6371b75628b4bae672474e08da8dab4d.png

1047 ms

20230411_rJ70_a78d64dd27e6471784770ded9ed4f7dc.jpg

20230411_rJ70_a78d64dd27e6471784770ded9ed4f7dc.jpg

862 ms

thumbnail_375_375_20210713_xOn_6d63f6ad1d377b3dcff5f7b463f68c74.jpg

thumbnail_375_375_20210713_xOn_6d63f6ad1d377b3dcff5f7b463f68c74.jpg

565 ms

thumbnail_375_375_20201117_xOn_fa40208d59e839eb37ab6b8a08363f41.jpg

thumbnail_375_375_20201117_xOn_fa40208d59e839eb37ab6b8a08363f41.jpg

580 ms

thumbnail_375_375_20200319_xOn_6fc825d5aa158e6b640d3e5bbf0fb206.jpg

thumbnail_375_375_20200319_xOn_6fc825d5aa158e6b640d3e5bbf0fb206.jpg

565 ms

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgo6eA.ttf

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgo6eA.ttf

105 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3Ttw.ttf

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3Ttw.ttf

140 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1CzTtw.ttf

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1CzTtw.ttf

190 ms

explore.png

explore.png

841 ms

track.png

track.png

768 ms

connect.png

connect.png

767 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

767 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

380 ms

footer_bg.png

footer_bg.png

583 ms

SystemSettings.js

SystemSettings.js

85 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

645 ms

Accessibility Review

dive.site accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

dive.site best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Requests the geolocation permission on page load

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

dive.site SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dive.site can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dive.site main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

dive.site

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Dive. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: