4.2 sec in total
126 ms
3.5 sec
626 ms
Click here to check amazing Dixline content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about dixline.com
Dixline Corporation is a metal fabrication and finishing company located in Galva, IL. We offer a wide range of manufacturing and finishing for your needs.
Visit dixline.comWe analyzed Dixline.com page load time and found that the first response time was 126 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
dixline.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.9 s
0/100
10%
Value27.0 s
0/100
25%
Value19.2 s
0/100
10%
Value1,790 ms
10/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value27.1 s
0/100
10%
126 ms
28 ms
1504 ms
43 ms
1578 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Dixline.com, 35% (27 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Dixline.com.
Page size can be reduced by 116.9 kB (3%)
4.6 MB
4.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Dixline.com main page is 4.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 81.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 81.3 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 33.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Dixline images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (36%)
45
29
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dixline. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
dixline.com
126 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
28 ms
0e787.css
1504 ms
css
43 ms
32f94.css
1578 ms
9538e.css
1499 ms
36f66.css
1668 ms
b2ed8.css
1485 ms
4b226.js
1602 ms
css
44 ms
css
42 ms
0fef6.js
2537 ms
api.js
62 ms
14157.js
2516 ms
003c2.js
2629 ms
29e8b.js
2628 ms
analytics.js
64 ms
dixline-logo.png
86 ms
IMG_7311-min.jpg
280 ms
IMG_7309-min.jpg
275 ms
IMG_7327-min.jpg
353 ms
Made-In-USA-1200x757-150x150.png
307 ms
IMG_1379-370x230.jpg
307 ms
IMG_7371-e1571687533678-370x230.jpg
307 ms
IMG_7308-e1571845175921-370x230.jpg
312 ms
die_photo2-620x364-370x230.jpg
313 ms
raw-corners-e1571666943619-370x230.jpg
326 ms
topcoat-370x230.jpg
332 ms
banner-electroplate-370x230.png
345 ms
dixline-truck-e1571245228431.jpg
357 ms
ISOCertified.jpg
369 ms
ISOEnvironment-300x150.jpg
377 ms
rohs-logo-300x150.png
390 ms
CFSAA-LOGO.jpg
393 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
140 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
157 ms
mem5YaGs126MiZpBA-UNirk-Vg-26.woff
409 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
142 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
141 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf
156 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAA-27.woff
422 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf
156 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzc.ttf
158 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
158 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf
161 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc9.ttf
163 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
163 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf
162 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc9.ttf
193 ms
Flaticon.woff
443 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc0CsE.ttf
162 ms
KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEz4dKg.ttf
193 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xGIzc.ttf
195 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc0CsE.ttf
195 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic0CsE.ttf
195 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc0CsE.ttf
195 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
463 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
194 ms
collect
127 ms
text-bg-2.jpg
532 ms
request-bg-1.jpg
468 ms
cursor.png
404 ms
js
82 ms
recaptcha__en.js
25 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
26 ms
revolution.extension.actions.min.js
33 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
27 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
29 ms
revolution.extension.parallax.min.js
30 ms
ajax-loader.gif
31 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
13 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aX8.ttf
16 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf
15 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
15 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
13 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
15 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
16 ms
dixline.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
dixline.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
dixline.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dixline.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dixline.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
dixline.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Dixline. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: