Tools & Wizards About Us
docs.dependencytrack.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 97

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    95% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 43% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 95

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

docs.dependencytrack.org

Introduction | Dependency-Track

Page Load Speed

572 ms in total

First Response

68 ms

Resources Loaded

187 ms

Page Rendered

317 ms

docs.dependencytrack.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Docs Dependency Track content for Canada. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about docs.dependencytrack.org

Product documentation

Visit docs.dependencytrack.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Docs.dependencytrack.org page load time and found that the first response time was 68 ms and then it took 504 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

docs.dependencytrack.org performance score

97

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

88/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

98/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.9 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.096

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.9 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

docs.dependencytrack.org

68 ms

css

26 ms

main.css

37 ms

dt-logo-white-text.svg

63 ms

dashboard.png

68 ms

Our browser made a total of 6 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Docs.dependencytrack.org, 17% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (68 ms) belongs to the original domain Docs.dependencytrack.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 47.5 kB (8%)

Content Size

569.8 kB

After Optimization

522.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Docs.dependencytrack.org main page is 569.8 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 555.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 10.5 kB

  • Original 14.2 kB
  • After minification 12.1 kB
  • After compression 3.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.0 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.5 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 37.0 kB

  • Original 555.6 kB
  • After minification 518.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Docs Dependency Track images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

5

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • CSS

The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Docs Dependency Track. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

docs.dependencytrack.org

docs.dependencytrack.org

68 ms

css

css

26 ms

main.css

main.css

37 ms

dt-logo-white-text.svg

dt-logo-white-text.svg

63 ms

dashboard.png

dashboard.png

68 ms

menu.svg

menu.svg

32 ms

Accessibility Review

docs.dependencytrack.org accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

docs.dependencytrack.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

docs.dependencytrack.org SEO score

95

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Docs.dependencytrack.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Docs.dependencytrack.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

docs.dependencytrack.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Docs Dependency Track. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: