1.6 sec in total
419 ms
974 ms
188 ms
Visit downlinebuilder.com now to see the best up-to-date Downline Builder content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about downlinebuilder.com
Home
Visit downlinebuilder.comWe analyzed Downlinebuilder.com page load time and found that the first response time was 419 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
downlinebuilder.com performance score
419 ms
81 ms
142 ms
128 ms
66 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Downlinebuilder.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (419 ms) belongs to the original domain Downlinebuilder.com.
Page size can be reduced by 180.7 kB (40%)
447.1 kB
266.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Downlinebuilder.com main page is 447.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 204.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 20.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.8 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Downline Builder images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 76.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 76.4 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 80.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Downlinebuilder.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 80.7 kB or 90% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (39%)
66
40
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Downline Builder. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
downlinebuilder.com
419 ms
font-awesome.css
81 ms
main.css
142 ms
home.css
128 ms
jquery.tt3videoplayer.css
66 ms
respond.min.js
74 ms
jquery.min.js
85 ms
carousel.js
75 ms
carousel_mobilify.js
91 ms
interface.js
102 ms
util.js
110 ms
modernizr-1.7.min.js
129 ms
swfobject.js
142 ms
video_static.js
142 ms
testimonials.js
142 ms
demo_player.js
161 ms
jquery.tt3videoplayer.js
169 ms
jquery.lightbox_me.js
133 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
134 ms
jquery.contentcarousel.js
138 ms
reset-html5-tag.css
38 ms
swfobject22.js
36 ms
AC_OETags.js
35 ms
mobile_detect.js
35 ms
bg-html.png
80 ms
bg-body.png
79 ms
logo-w-tagline.svg
83 ms
logo.png
79 ms
screen.jpg
80 ms
thumb.jpg
81 ms
thumb.jpg
104 ms
thumb.jpg
85 ms
thumb.jpg
104 ms
thumb.jpg
103 ms
thumb.jpg
104 ms
thumb.jpg
104 ms
thumb.jpg
113 ms
thumb.jpg
120 ms
thumb.jpg
129 ms
thumb.jpg
132 ms
thumb.jpg
140 ms
thumb.jpg
143 ms
thumb.jpg
154 ms
thumb.jpg
165 ms
thumb.jpg
181 ms
thumb.jpg
189 ms
thumb.jpg
191 ms
thumb.jpg
192 ms
thumb.jpg
204 ms
thumb.jpg
208 ms
thumb.jpg
230 ms
thumb.jpg
226 ms
thumb.jpg
237 ms
thumb.jpg
238 ms
demo_screenshot.jpg
233 ms
downline_logo.png
236 ms
facebook.png
253 ms
twitter.png
262 ms
youtube.png
262 ms
thumb.jpg
253 ms
ga.js
25 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
232 ms
thumb.jpg
222 ms
thumb.jpg
217 ms
thumb.jpg
237 ms
play-small.png
215 ms
external_link.png
223 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
ca-carousel-controls.png
229 ms
downlinebuilder.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Downlinebuilder.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Downlinebuilder.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
downlinebuilder.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Downline Builder. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: