Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 51

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 21% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

drainagesuffolk.uk

Drainage Suffolk | Drainage Suffolk are Drainage Specialists in Suffolk

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

27 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

434 ms

drainagesuffolk.uk screenshot

About Website

Welcome to drainagesuffolk.uk homepage info - get ready to check Drainage Suffolk best content right away, or after learning these important things about drainagesuffolk.uk

Drainage Suffolk, 24 Hour Drainage Specialists in Suffolk, Suffolk, Professional Blocked Drain Local Company, Near Me Call 01502 801021.

Visit drainagesuffolk.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Drainagesuffolk.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 27 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

drainagesuffolk.uk performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

62/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value21.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.7 s

16/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value160 ms

94/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.9 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

drainagesuffolk.uk

27 ms

drainagesuffolk.uk

365 ms

bootstrap.css

15 ms

bootstrap-theme.css

21 ms

style.css

23 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Drainagesuffolk.uk, 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (797 ms) belongs to the original domain Drainagesuffolk.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 73.0 kB (1%)

Content Size

7.2 MB

After Optimization

7.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Drainagesuffolk.uk main page is 7.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 7.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 43.8 kB

  • Original 56.6 kB
  • After minification 56.5 kB
  • After compression 12.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.8 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 27.5 kB

  • Original 7.0 MB
  • After minification 7.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Drainage Suffolk images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 110.4 kB
  • After minification 110.4 kB
  • After compression 108.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 69 B

  • Original 51.9 kB
  • After minification 51.9 kB
  • After compression 51.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Drainagesuffolk.uk has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (37%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

34

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Drainage Suffolk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

drainagesuffolk.uk accessibility score

51

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

drainagesuffolk.uk best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

drainagesuffolk.uk SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Drainagesuffolk.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Drainagesuffolk.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Drainage Suffolk. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: