8.5 sec in total
310 ms
7.9 sec
287 ms
Visit dreamflower.in now to see the best up-to-date Dreamflower content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about dreamflower.in
Kochi’s most prompt builder with a track of 52 premium projects delivered on time. Semi furnished 2 BHK & 3 BHK flats with no hidden charges and after sales service support.
Visit dreamflower.inWe analyzed Dreamflower.in page load time and found that the first response time was 310 ms and then it took 8.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
dreamflower.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
26/100
10%
Value8.2 s
2/100
25%
Value6.3 s
42/100
10%
Value110 ms
97/100
30%
Value0.219
57/100
15%
Value9.5 s
30/100
10%
310 ms
339 ms
101 ms
301 ms
201 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Dreamflower.in, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Dreamflower.in.
Page size can be reduced by 370.8 kB (9%)
4.0 MB
3.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Dreamflower.in main page is 4.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.9 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 109.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Dreamflower images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 91.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 91.5 kB or 56% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 122.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dreamflower.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 122.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (27%)
73
53
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dreamflower. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
dreamflower.in
310 ms
www.dreamflower.in
339 ms
style.css
101 ms
bootstrap.min.css
301 ms
bootstrap.min.js
201 ms
jquery.min.js
70 ms
jquery.flexisel.js
199 ms
responsiveslides.min.js
208 ms
html5.js
208 ms
html5lightbox.js
212 ms
menu.css
294 ms
script.js
296 ms
analytics.js
42 ms
kb.jpg
146 ms
logo.jpg
519 ms
award1.jpg
148 ms
award2.jpg
146 ms
ico1.jpg
148 ms
zenobia.jpg
975 ms
cheruparambath.jpg
1070 ms
sandford.jpg
1478 ms
zinia.jpg
1360 ms
begonia.jpg
1149 ms
cynosure.jpg
6653 ms
casagardenza.jpg
1453 ms
monparadis.jpg
1366 ms
simple-php-captcha.php
1274 ms
right.jpg
1377 ms
monparadis_s.jpg
1464 ms
akademia_s.jpg
1465 ms
estella_s.jpg
1482 ms
villa-rio_s.jpg
1549 ms
llanos_s.jpg
1561 ms
claire_s.jpg
1568 ms
casa-bella_s.jpg
1570 ms
ibiza_s.jpg
1585 ms
estella2_s.jpg
1646 ms
zenobia_s.jpg
1657 ms
cynosure_s.jpg
1672 ms
casagardenza_s.jpg
1667 ms
cheruparambath_s.jpg
1688 ms
velvetude2_s.jpg
1742 ms
aquamarina_s.jpg
1754 ms
you.jpg
1763 ms
logo2.jpg
1776 ms
f1.jpg
1791 ms
googleplus.png
1838 ms
sdk.js
25 ms
menu-bg.jpg
1826 ms
menu.gif
1837 ms
collect
41 ms
sep.jpg
1747 ms
drop-down.png
1761 ms
line.jpg
1798 ms
311676026-Helvetica.svg
1961 ms
192 ms
css
84 ms
xd_arbiter.php
81 ms
xd_arbiter.php
103 ms
like.php
81 ms
TY3MhkXpWJ-.js
37 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
32 ms
873107911-sourcesanspro-bold-webfont.svg
1458 ms
1342774-sourcesanspro-semibold-webfont.svg
1027 ms
960571290-sourcesanspro-regular-webfont.svg
946 ms
lightbox-next.png
893 ms
lightbox-prev.png
796 ms
lightbox-close.png
744 ms
downArrow.png
783 ms
873107911-sourcesanspro-bold-webfont.woff
161 ms
1342774-sourcesanspro-semibold-webfont.woff
158 ms
960571290-sourcesanspro-regular-webfont.woff
183 ms
311676026-Helvetica.woff
200 ms
button-previous.png
202 ms
button-next.png
213 ms
dreamflower.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
dreamflower.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
dreamflower.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dreamflower.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Dreamflower.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
dreamflower.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Dreamflower. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: