3.5 sec in total
408 ms
2.9 sec
163 ms
Welcome to dscomparison.com homepage info - get ready to check DSComparison best content for Jordan right away, or after learning these important things about dscomparison.com
Dropshipper's starting point. Find what you need with just a few clicks. Browse through Top Dropshipping Tools, Services, Suppliers, discounts & more!
Visit dscomparison.comWe analyzed Dscomparison.com page load time and found that the first response time was 408 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
dscomparison.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.0 s
0/100
10%
Value9.4 s
0/100
25%
Value9.3 s
12/100
10%
Value260 ms
83/100
30%
Value0.112
87/100
15%
Value15.4 s
7/100
10%
408 ms
1043 ms
61 ms
52 ms
27 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Dscomparison.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Dscomparison.com.
Page size can be reduced by 845.4 kB (63%)
1.3 MB
496.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Dscomparison.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 528.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 63.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.0 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. DSComparison images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 323.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 323.3 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 446.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dscomparison.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 446.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (86%)
56
8
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of DSComparison. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
dscomparison.com
408 ms
dscomparison.com
1043 ms
js
61 ms
js
52 ms
analytics.js
27 ms
sgr.css
183 ms
style.min.css
380 ms
styles.css
297 ms
save.css
393 ms
front-legacy.css
298 ms
style.css
298 ms
font-awesome.min.css
393 ms
owl.carousel.css
392 ms
owl.transitions.css
396 ms
colorbox.css
394 ms
animate.css
568 ms
tx-style.css
676 ms
sfsi-style.css
582 ms
fl-icons.css
485 ms
front.min.css
486 ms
flatsome.css
775 ms
style.css
581 ms
sgr.js
584 ms
jquery.min.js
758 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
676 ms
front.min.js
677 ms
sdk.js
32 ms
collect
49 ms
collect
52 ms
sow-button-atom-857739567c6a-132.css
595 ms
style.css
687 ms
style.css
689 ms
style.css
689 ms
style.css
731 ms
index.js
791 ms
index.js
792 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
791 ms
masonry.min.js
792 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
792 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
900 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
899 ms
jquery.inview.min.js
899 ms
tx-script.js
899 ms
core.min.js
898 ms
modernizr.custom.min.js
812 ms
jquery.shuffle.min.js
760 ms
random-shuffle-min.js
771 ms
custom.js
862 ms
flatsome-live-search.js
686 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
677 ms
flatsome.js
781 ms
webfont.js
76 ms
pngDSComparison.png
540 ms
DS-COmparison-Log-Whiter.png
454 ms
sdk.js
59 ms
fl-icons.ttf
282 ms
css
50 ms
76 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
438 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
343 ms
ionicons.ttf
629 ms
icomoon.ttf
358 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWyWtFCc.ttf
34 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf
35 ms
If2cXTr6YS-zF4S-kcSWSVi_sxjsohD9F50Ruu7BMSo3Sup5hNX6pmRM.ttf
65 ms
overlay.png
103 ms
dscomparison.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
dscomparison.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
dscomparison.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dscomparison.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dscomparison.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
dscomparison.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of DSComparison. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: