Tools & Wizards About Us
dsf.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 88

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    90% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

dsf.in

Home

Page Load Speed

7.3 sec in total

First Response

435 ms

Resources Loaded

6.8 sec

Page Rendered

87 ms

dsf.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Dsf content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about dsf.in

DSF,Gadgets.in

Visit dsf.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Dsf.in page load time and found that the first response time was 435 ms and then it took 6.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

dsf.in performance score

88

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

66/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

89/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.5 s

39/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.5 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

dsf.in

435 ms

dsf.in

2961 ms

template.min.css

989 ms

colors_standard.min.css

619 ms

joomla-alert.min.css

641 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Dsf.in and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Dsf.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 168.5 kB (40%)

Content Size

416.8 kB

After Optimization

248.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Dsf.in main page is 416.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 164.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 81.1 kB

  • Original 92.0 kB
  • After minification 90.7 kB
  • After compression 11.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 81.1 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 10.7 kB

  • Original 68.8 kB
  • After minification 58.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Dsf needs image optimization as it can save up to 10.7 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 42.3 kB

  • Original 164.1 kB
  • After minification 164.1 kB
  • After compression 121.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 42.3 kB or 26% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 34.3 kB

  • Original 91.9 kB
  • After minification 91.9 kB
  • After compression 57.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dsf.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 34.3 kB or 37% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (74%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dsf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

dsf.in

dsf.in

435 ms

dsf.in

dsf.in

2961 ms

template.min.css

template.min.css

989 ms

colors_standard.min.css

colors_standard.min.css

619 ms

joomla-alert.min.css

joomla-alert.min.css

641 ms

main.css

main.css

654 ms

creativecss-ui.css

creativecss-ui.css

649 ms

creative-scroll.css

creative-scroll.css

651 ms

template.css

template.css

1248 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

1232 ms

template.min.js

template.min.js

1264 ms

messages.min.js

messages.min.js

1311 ms

creativelib.js

creativelib.js

1853 ms

creativelib-ui.js

creativelib-ui.js

2313 ms

creative-mousewheel.js

creative-mousewheel.js

1890 ms

creative-scroll.js

creative-scroll.js

1903 ms

creativecontactform.js

creativecontactform.js

2112 ms

joomla-alert.css

joomla-alert.css

1295 ms

Screenshot%202022-12-25%20at%206.03.33%20PM.png

Screenshot%202022-12-25%20at%206.03.33%20PM.png

1022 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

652 ms

glyphicons-halflings.png

glyphicons-halflings.png

668 ms

Accessibility Review

dsf.in accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.

Best Practices

dsf.in best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

dsf.in SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dsf.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dsf.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

dsf.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Dsf. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: