10.7 sec in total
1.3 sec
8.5 sec
879 ms
Visit dsl-anbietervergleich.com now to see the best up-to-date DSL Anbieter Vergleich content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about dsl-anbietervergleich.com
DSL Vergleich | Günstige DSL Anbieter kostenlos online vergleichen ✓ Einfach & online ᐅ wechseln ✓ Bis zu 225 € Cashback sichern ✓✓Jetzt hier vergleichen ✓✓
Visit dsl-anbietervergleich.comWe analyzed Dsl-anbietervergleich.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 9.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
dsl-anbietervergleich.com performance score
1314 ms
218 ms
218 ms
218 ms
221 ms
Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Dsl-anbietervergleich.com, 13% (8 requests) were made to Cdn0-telko.check24.de and 3% (2 requests) were made to Www1.stats4free.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Dsl-anbietervergleich.com.
Page size can be reduced by 810.2 kB (70%)
1.2 MB
342.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Dsl-anbietervergleich.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 749.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, DSL Anbieter Vergleich needs image optimization as it can save up to 30.1 kB or 30% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 517.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 517.6 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 226.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dsl-anbietervergleich.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 226.2 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (68%)
59
19
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of DSL Anbieter Vergleich. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.dsl-anbietervergleich.com
1314 ms
style.css
218 ms
wp-cat-list-theme.css
218 ms
wp-cat-list-light.css
218 ms
wp-cat-list-dark.css
221 ms
wp-cat-list-giant-gold-fish.css
221 ms
wp-cat-list-adrift-in-dreams.css
434 ms
prettyPhoto.css
648 ms
plugins.css
437 ms
themeblvd.css
755 ms
theme.min.css
556 ms
responsive.min.css
438 ms
colors.min.css
761 ms
wp-ui.css
769 ms
wpui-light.css
765 ms
css.php
1365 ms
jquery.js
1321 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
970 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
1191 ms
superfish.js
983 ms
flexslider.js
1094 ms
roundabout.js
1408 ms
themeblvd.js
1199 ms
core.min.js
1315 ms
widget.min.js
1513 ms
tabs.min.js
1528 ms
accordion.min.js
1636 ms
mouse.min.js
1538 ms
resizable.min.js
1793 ms
draggable.min.js
1836 ms
button.min.js
1840 ms
position.min.js
1849 ms
dialog.min.js
1858 ms
sortable.min.js
2074 ms
www.dsl-anbietervergleich.com
2475 ms
wp-ui.js
2275 ms
css
25 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1848 ms
counter.php
301 ms
trans-noise.png
217 ms
thick-dark-divider.png
212 ms
dsl-anbietervergleich.png
325 ms
menu-bg.png
218 ms
main-bg.png
331 ms
main-shadow.png
224 ms
article-shadow-light.png
429 ms
dsl-anbieter-940x199.jpg
742 ms
stat.php
147 ms
sf-arrows-ffffff.png
411 ms
vergleich.html
297 ms
vergleich.html
422 ms
dsl.html
298 ms
0022-jquery.getQueryParameters.v697544137.minified.js
426 ms
combined.v3243938026.minified.js
850 ms
0003-jquery-c24slider.v697544137.minified.js
450 ms
0242-c24tiptool.v697544137.minified.js
463 ms
dynamic_244a2251771b176fba984a069a7c5ba2.v95541441513324804134246566595283068866011465545181477056446.minified.css
460 ms
select_arrow.png
102 ms
loader.gif
98 ms
sprite.png
103 ms
c24-font.woff
204 ms
handler.do
916 ms
dsl-anbietervergleich.com SEO score
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dsl-anbietervergleich.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dsl-anbietervergleich.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
dsl-anbietervergleich.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of DSL Anbieter Vergleich. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: