11.4 sec in total
240 ms
11 sec
105 ms
Visit fs1.d-h.st now to see the best up-to-date Fs 1 D H content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about fs1.d-h.st
Desc
Visit fs1.d-h.stWe analyzed Fs1.d-h.st page load time and found that the first response time was 240 ms and then it took 11.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Fs1.d-h.st rating and web reputation
fs1.d-h.st performance score
240 ms
31 ms
64 ms
62 ms
68 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 25% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Fs1.d-h.st, 13% (7 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.4 sec) relates to the external source S7.addthis.com.
Page size can be reduced by 374.6 kB (63%)
597.0 kB
222.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Fs1.d-h.st main page is 597.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 505.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 55.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.9 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 372 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Fs 1 D H needs image optimization as it can save up to 372 B or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 310.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 310.3 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fs1.d-h.st needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.0 kB or 75% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (52%)
50
24
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fs 1 D H. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
fs1.d-h.st
240 ms
jquery.min.js
31 ms
postmessage.js
64 ms
jquery.progressbar.js
62 ms
jquery.colorbox.js
68 ms
dev-host.js
67 ms
reset.css
65 ms
css
27 ms
dev-host.css
65 ms
colorbox.css
119 ms
show_ads.js
6 ms
addthis_widget.js
4351 ms
ca-pub-2554078832478360.js
127 ms
zrt_lookup.html
45 ms
show_ads_impl.js
64 ms
bg.png
47 ms
alert-overlay.png
115 ms
8d6bGRHQjSQfnRvIX_v_pwLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf
46 ms
UyNOlq8pwXsdXFw6uDx3EgOlcqJ5UJ1oEqpKcXD9BFD3rGVtsTkPsbDajuO5ueQw.ttf
22 ms
rr0ijB5_2nAJsAoZ6vECXSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
31 ms
securimage_show_example.php
265 ms
refresh.png
234 ms
osd.js
4 ms
progressbg_green.gif
91 ms
300lo.json
49 ms
all.js&version=v2.0
43 ms
widgets.js
17 ms
plusone.js
89 ms
counter.8eb9e83b9fa0d4af1e4f.js
150 ms
progressbg_orange.gif
105 ms
progressbg_red.gif
103 ms
progressbar.gif
103 ms
sh.7c7179124ea24ac6ba46caac.html
78 ms
button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js
56 ms
146 ms
xd_arbiter.php
34 ms
xd_arbiter.php
65 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
84 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
111 ms
fastbutton
145 ms
tweet_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.en.html
31 ms
shares.json
518 ms
postmessageRelay
43 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
21 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
30 ms
pJeswbKZO4XwVR0035gpgvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
86 ms
jot
124 ms
api.js
43 ms
core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js
81 ms
2536007149-postmessagerelay.js
77 ms
like.php
66 ms
vpc6VNjRPXV.js
28 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
22 ms
del.gif
32 ms
ping
32 ms
like.php
54 ms
fs1.d-h.st SEO score
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fs1.d-h.st can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Fs1.d-h.st main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fs1.d-h.st
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fs 1 D H. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: