2.4 sec in total
388 ms
1.9 sec
166 ms
Click here to check amazing Ru Distance content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ru.distance.to
Популярный калькулятор расстояний считает расстояния в километрах между любыми местами и координатами, предлагает маршруты, интерактивные карты и информацию.
Visit ru.distance.toWe analyzed Ru.distance.to page load time and found that the first response time was 388 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
ru.distance.to performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
76/100
10%
Value2.8 s
84/100
25%
Value5.1 s
62/100
10%
Value8,880 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value12.8 s
13/100
10%
388 ms
175 ms
179 ms
10 ms
14 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 18% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Ru.distance.to, 41% (30 requests) were made to Osm.nearest.place and 7% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (660 ms) relates to the external source Osm.nearest.place.
Page size can be reduced by 415.2 kB (51%)
810.8 kB
395.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Ru.distance.to main page is 810.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 537.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 20.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.6 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ru Distance needs image optimization as it can save up to 27.4 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 344.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 344.6 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ru.distance.to needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (42%)
71
41
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ru Distance. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
ru.distance.to
388 ms
style.css
175 ms
mq.css
179 ms
jquery.min.js
10 ms
leaflet.js
14 ms
leaflet.css
13 ms
slide.js
213 ms
func.inc.js
214 ms
ui.js
214 ms
leaflet.geodesic.min.js
216 ms
leaflet.encoded.min.js
262 ms
jquery.autocomplete.js
353 ms
directions.js
265 ms
localdata.js
150 ms
show_ads.js
7 ms
gpt.js
24 ms
ca-pub-8911258659078168.js
49 ms
zrt_lookup.html
55 ms
show_ads_impl.js
93 ms
ru-RU.png
190 ms
start.gif
182 ms
end.gif
183 ms
ga.js
77 ms
measure.min.js
28 ms
ads.min.js
12 ms
pubads_impl_81.js
24 ms
textlink-ads.jpg
42 ms
container.html
72 ms
textlink-ads.jpg
69 ms
ads
246 ms
__utm.gif
33 ms
osd.js
11 ms
a.js
26 ms
5171746271700867932
63 ms
abg.js
42 ms
m_js_controller.js
61 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
100 ms
s
34 ms
redir.html
62 ms
x_button_blue2.png
32 ms
2.png
224 ms
2.png
217 ms
1.png
217 ms
1.png
214 ms
3.png
214 ms
3.png
210 ms
2.png
389 ms
2.png
305 ms
1.png
309 ms
1.png
308 ms
3.png
306 ms
3.png
308 ms
0.png
398 ms
0.png
399 ms
4.png
401 ms
4.png
400 ms
0.png
399 ms
0.png
478 ms
2.png
490 ms
2.png
491 ms
4.png
493 ms
4.png
492 ms
1.png
493 ms
1.png
569 ms
3.png
583 ms
3.png
583 ms
0.png
585 ms
0.png
584 ms
4.png
585 ms
4.png
660 ms
iframe.html
52 ms
ui
68 ms
E4WYPs_lNJIuXrWpTsOcc3FIG36RfI0ERc0srw5QW9Y.js
8 ms
ru.distance.to accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
[lang] attributes do not have a valid value
ru.distance.to best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
ru.distance.to SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ru.distance.to can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ru.distance.to main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ru.distance.to
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ru Distance. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: