1.3 sec in total
39 ms
916 ms
383 ms
Visit sw.desiringgod.org now to see the best up-to-date Sw Desiring God content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sw.desiringgod.org
Visit sw.desiringgod.orgWe analyzed Sw.desiringgod.org page load time and found that the first response time was 39 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
sw.desiringgod.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
79/100
10%
Value4.8 s
31/100
25%
Value2.7 s
97/100
10%
Value440 ms
64/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value6.7 s
56/100
10%
39 ms
444 ms
58 ms
12 ms
39 ms
Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Sw.desiringgod.org, 24% (5 requests) were made to Fast.fonts.net and 19% (4 requests) were made to Cdn2.desiringgod.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (444 ms) relates to the external source Desiringgod.org.
Page size can be reduced by 779.6 kB (78%)
1.0 MB
226.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Sw.desiringgod.org main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 554.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 61.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.8 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sw Desiring God images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 391.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 391.2 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 326.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sw.desiringgod.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 326.6 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (50%)
14
7
The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sw Desiring God. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
sw.desiringgod.org
39 ms
swahili
444 ms
ce7bfb04-8dba-4ff8-a71f-29a92cfbb0f7.css
58 ms
application-352b0e85e4288dde631d9e54ecaf9f7c1fe6b9e4b622d759455b9a292153897f.css
12 ms
application-7565d4a98312dbf99908da0f9413848e947e35e61a8bdef596da107191dd502d.js
39 ms
hotjar-9380.js
139 ms
analytics.js
135 ms
apj-icon-76x76-855a50fbbd647cc5dba63fa9fb255c83f70bc4310df9948401f6b5b8c5393aaf.png
134 ms
lab-icon-76x76-df1ebf85b1aaec3a9675a5c6a6eb2f751cfec317155c56025bf86481aa216cfa.png
21 ms
i.js
21 ms
f06f74cb994f261c5370fc3dd671a5ac43c392ea.2.js
23 ms
0883e78e-2f93-4602-b542-f7f798239194.woff
40 ms
85061542-d7de-408a-bd04-137fd9170af0.woff
95 ms
58051db9-681f-48c2-b278-54ad54a8c444.woff
95 ms
3c253249-5a5d-48b8-a812-894ed905bfed.woff
95 ms
linkid.js
9 ms
modules-043c1e6abe660c48857202e419ff9d8a.js
56 ms
collect
45 ms
e
36 ms
collect
67 ms
nr-885.min.js
16 ms
sw.desiringgod.org accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sw.desiringgod.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
sw.desiringgod.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
SW
SW
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sw.desiringgod.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Swahili is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sw.desiringgod.org main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
sw.desiringgod.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sw Desiring God. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: