3.2 sec in total
62 ms
2.6 sec
601 ms
Click here to check amazing Backyard Exmark content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about backyard.exmark.com
What you get out of your yard is what matters most. Our goal is to provide the inspiration, tips and know how needed to live the backyard life.
Visit backyard.exmark.comWe analyzed Backyard.exmark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 62 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
backyard.exmark.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value6.7 s
8/100
25%
Value5.3 s
59/100
10%
Value480 ms
60/100
30%
Value0.084
93/100
15%
Value9.1 s
33/100
10%
62 ms
844 ms
32 ms
135 ms
1026 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 27% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Backyard.exmark.com, 10% (4 requests) were made to Cm.g.doubleclick.net and 7% (3 requests) were made to Script.crazyegg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Use.typekit.net.
Page size can be reduced by 146.4 kB (34%)
436.1 kB
289.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Backyard.exmark.com main page is 436.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 177.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 115.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 115.3 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 17.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Backyard.exmark.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.6 kB or 15% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (68%)
31
10
The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Backyard Exmark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
backyard.exmark.com
62 ms
backyard.exmark.com
844 ms
autoptimize_29d68350e70dfb2587b4f6bd6b695749.css
32 ms
css
135 ms
aet5fcc.css
1026 ms
jquery.min.js
82 ms
IqSLfMWi.js
98 ms
js
183 ms
5940.js
105 ms
pinit.js
90 ms
autoptimize_327195354006ff745c860f62a3c0e2e2.js
87 ms
p.css
73 ms
gtm.js
128 ms
facebook.svg
90 ms
x.svg
88 ms
instagram.svg
92 ms
youtube.svg
89 ms
pinterest.svg
90 ms
close.svg
92 ms
backyard.exmark.com.json
45 ms
84a07e3a698688683d493761c9786bde.js
51 ms
d
256 ms
jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0O6tKx8a8zI.woff
104 ms
core.js
95 ms
tag
227 ms
fbevents.js
93 ms
beacon
198 ms
analytics.min.js
144 ms
pinit_main.js
42 ms
beacon
218 ms
pixel
103 ms
pixel
102 ms
p
102 ms
generic
57 ms
generic
58 ms
pixel
16 ms
pixel
16 ms
match-result
3 ms
match-result
4 ms
v2
16 ms
v2
14 ms
backyard.exmark.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
backyard.exmark.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
backyard.exmark.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Backyard.exmark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Backyard.exmark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
backyard.exmark.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: