Tools & Wizards About Us
bio-fuel.energytechreview.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

bio-fuel.energytechreview.com

Energy Tech Review Magazine

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

138 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

266 ms

bio-fuel.energytechreview.com screenshot

About Website

Visit bio-fuel.energytechreview.com now to see the best up-to-date Bio Fuel Energy Tech Review content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bio-fuel.energytechreview.com

Energy Tech Review is a print and digital magazine sharing expert opinions, the latest energy tech news, and analyses on key issues in energy tech industry.

Visit bio-fuel.energytechreview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bio-fuel.energytechreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 138 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bio-fuel.energytechreview.com performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

46/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.2 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

49/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,480 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.006

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.2 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bio-fuel.energytechreview.com

138 ms

bio-fuel.energytechreview.com

610 ms

bootstrap.css

374 ms

bootsatrap.min_custom.css

299 ms

font-awesome.min.css

297 ms

Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 15% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Bio-fuel.energytechreview.com, 49% (39 requests) were made to Energytechreview.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (682 ms) relates to the external source Energytechreview.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 468.0 kB (31%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bio-fuel.energytechreview.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 843.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 81.5 kB

  • Original 104.2 kB
  • After minification 103.2 kB
  • After compression 22.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 81.5 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 7.1 kB

  • Original 327.2 kB
  • After minification 320.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bio Fuel Energy Tech Review images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 204.7 kB

  • Original 843.7 kB
  • After minification 840.3 kB
  • After compression 639.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 204.7 kB or 24% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 174.8 kB

  • Original 218.4 kB
  • After minification 184.5 kB
  • After compression 43.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bio-fuel.energytechreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 174.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (66%)

Requests Now

70

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bio Fuel Energy Tech Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bio-fuel.energytechreview.com

bio-fuel.energytechreview.com

138 ms

bio-fuel.energytechreview.com

bio-fuel.energytechreview.com

610 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

374 ms

bootsatrap.min_custom.css

bootsatrap.min_custom.css

299 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

297 ms

animate.css

animate.css

304 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

302 ms

owl.theme.default.css

owl.theme.default.css

307 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

358 ms

slicknav.min.css

slicknav.min.css

360 ms

style1.css

style1.css

121 ms

main.css

main.css

368 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

366 ms

modernizr-3.5.0.min.js

modernizr-3.5.0.min.js

370 ms

css

css

100 ms

css

css

121 ms

css

css

134 ms

js

js

106 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

102 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

104 ms

element.js

element.js

99 ms

new_region.css

new_region.css

534 ms

ad.js

ad.js

534 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

61 ms

style.css

style.css

127 ms

jQuery.verticalCarousel.css

jQuery.verticalCarousel.css

183 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

46 ms

jQuery.verticalCarousel.js

jQuery.verticalCarousel.js

187 ms

jquery.flipbox.css

jquery.flipbox.css

188 ms

cube_slider.css

cube_slider.css

196 ms

jquery.flipbox.js

jquery.flipbox.js

197 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

498 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

495 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

497 ms

jquery.slicknav.min.js

jquery.slicknav.min.js

497 ms

masonry.pkgd.min.js

masonry.pkgd.min.js

497 ms

main.js

main.js

496 ms

smart-sticky.js

smart-sticky.js

682 ms

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

theia-sticky-sidebar.js

681 ms

jquery_cookie.js

jquery_cookie.js

681 ms

custom.js

custom.js

680 ms

jquery.easy-ticker.js

jquery.easy-ticker.js

680 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

161 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

336 ms

atrk.js

atrk.js

128 ms

Final-Logo.png

Final-Logo.png

148 ms

Artboard_9.jpg

Artboard_9.jpg

148 ms

linkedin_cirr.png

linkedin_cirr.png

148 ms

load.gif

load.gif

333 ms

450x308_3iv2.jpg

450x308_3iv2.jpg

435 ms

450x308_vq2x.jpg

450x308_vq2x.jpg

496 ms

mlvep300.jpg

mlvep300.jpg

435 ms

450x308_7A3h.jpg

450x308_7A3h.jpg

434 ms

450x308_9f2R.jpg

450x308_9f2R.jpg

434 ms

450x308_073n.jpg

450x308_073n.jpg

433 ms

tkszxRanking-logo.jpg

tkszxRanking-logo.jpg

569 ms

450x308_EDm2.jpg

450x308_EDm2.jpg

496 ms

450x308_GfPd.jpg

450x308_GfPd.jpg

535 ms

450x308_D03A.jpg

450x308_D03A.jpg

534 ms

x.png

x.png

494 ms

pubads_impl.js

pubads_impl.js

86 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

213 ms

jizDREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTiUf2zI.ttf

jizDREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTiUf2zI.ttf

186 ms

jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi3s-CI0q14.ttf

jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi3s-CI0q14.ttf

279 ms

jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi20-SI0q14.ttf

jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi20-SI0q14.ttf

299 ms

css

css

248 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

289 ms

jsonp.js

jsonp.js

231 ms

collect

collect

118 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtY.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtY.ttf

142 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

264 ms

sep_img.png

sep_img.png

238 ms

js

js

158 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

64 ms

ads

ads

69 ms

atb.gif

atb.gif

125 ms

energytechreview_top.jfif

energytechreview_top.jfif

124 ms

icon-up.png

icon-up.png

74 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

65 ms

Accessibility Review

bio-fuel.energytechreview.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

bio-fuel.energytechreview.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

bio-fuel.energytechreview.com SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bio-fuel.energytechreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Bio-fuel.energytechreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bio-fuel.energytechreview.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bio Fuel Energy Tech Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: