5 sec in total
232 ms
3.7 sec
1.1 sec
Visit e-mark.shop now to see the best up-to-date E Mark content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about e-mark.shop
Create and personalise your DIY-projects. Design in the app and print it easily on almost every surface.
Visit e-mark.shopWe analyzed E-mark.shop page load time and found that the first response time was 232 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
e-mark.shop performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value4.4 s
39/100
25%
Value10.3 s
8/100
10%
Value2,080 ms
7/100
30%
Value0.031
100/100
15%
Value20.2 s
2/100
10%
232 ms
1252 ms
212 ms
297 ms
295 ms
Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original E-mark.shop, 93% (89 requests) were made to Colop.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Webcache-eu.datareporter.eu. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Colop.com.
Page size can be reduced by 389.0 kB (16%)
2.5 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of E-mark.shop main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 199.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 199.4 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 101.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. E Mark images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 644 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 87.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. E-mark.shop needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 87.4 kB or 73% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (12%)
93
82
The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of E Mark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
e-mark.shop
232 ms
mobile-printing
1252 ms
0ca5fe28b45c279ff2b2a9cc0522acaf.min.css
212 ms
styles-l.min.css
297 ms
coloptheme.min.css
295 ms
572e4f28ca080908922cee751899dad1.min.js
396 ms
menu_en_eur.css
302 ms
banner.css
237 ms
v2
23 ms
trad.js
84 ms
inlineretarget.js
92 ms
banner.js
274 ms
X6119367B87F30B7459E98A2DE8EFD0F9.js
25 ms
custom.css
104 ms
logo.svg
101 ms
icon_colop-group_1.jpg
104 ms
icon_business-policy_1.jpg
197 ms
icon_team_1.jpg
104 ms
icon_working-at-colop_1.jpg
103 ms
icon_certificates-awards_1.jpg
199 ms
family-printerline-250x250_3.jpg
200 ms
rootimgicon.jpg
199 ms
heavyduty_250x250_2.jpg
298 ms
eos-line_400x400_2.jpg
394 ms
family-greenline-250x250_1.jpg
296 ms
family-pocketstamps-250x250_2.jpg
297 ms
family-bandstamps-250x250_2.jpg
298 ms
family-diy-sets-250x250_1.jpg
299 ms
family-motivationalstamps-250x250_1.jpg
395 ms
family-embossingpress-250x250_1.jpg
396 ms
family-inks-pads-250x250_1.jpg
397 ms
e-mark-go_side_250x250_1_2.jpg
398 ms
create_product_250x250_1_3.jpg
396 ms
emark_product_250x250_5.jpg
492 ms
Icon_Support_1.jpg
494 ms
ladot-250x250_1.jpg
495 ms
Design_ohne_Titel_8__1.png
593 ms
make1_250x250_1.jpg
495 ms
woodies-miniwoodies-product-overview_website.jpg
496 ms
NIO_250x250_1_2.jpg
591 ms
cleany-250x250_1.jpg
598 ms
may-and-berry_1.jpg
598 ms
e-mark-go_side.jpg
598 ms
create_product_white_1200x1200.jpg
600 ms
emark_white_product_1200x1200_2.jpg
689 ms
colop_emark_go-bundle_22.jpg
690 ms
colop_emark_go-bundle_35.jpg
692 ms
go_boxes_group.jpg
693 ms
go_usecase_ribbonguide_hand_whitedesk.jpg
692 ms
create_packaging_group2.jpg
689 ms
colop-icons.woff
788 ms
emark_packaging_group.jpg
690 ms
e-mark_box_cartridge_c2.jpg
693 ms
13-550x1100.jpg
693 ms
12-2-550x1100.jpg
708 ms
9-square-550x1100.jpg
795 ms
Kalan-Krafting-Picture-1-550x1100.jpg
789 ms
CIOCCOLATERIA_MARINELLO_Still-550x1100.jpg
792 ms
UV_blog11-960x540.jpg
609 ms
ZB-COL-Use-Case-Textilshop-EN-Hi-Final_Moment-550x1100.jpg
789 ms
divider_shot2-550x1100.jpg
694 ms
Creative_Impulse_Awards_COLOP_Logo.jpg
696 ms
GIA22_GOLD_250x250.jpg
789 ms
GermanDesign_RGB-250x250.png
697 ms
NAOPA_PREV-250x250.png
795 ms
EOPA-250x250.png
695 ms
if_designaward2020_red_l_cmyk-250x250.jpg
696 ms
Certificate-Editors-Choise-Award-250x250.jpg
787 ms
Singarpur_PIE_Winner_corp-250x250.jpg
790 ms
Innovation_Excellence_Award_Winner-250x250.jpg
697 ms
RedDot_RGB-250x250.jpg
696 ms
DasB_ro_Top100_Label_2019-250x250.jpg
697 ms
mastercard.png
788 ms
visa.png
788 ms
paypal.png
693 ms
klarna.png
692 ms
icon_facebook.png
689 ms
icon_instagram.png
691 ms
icon_linkedin.png
783 ms
icon_youtube.png
781 ms
icon_tiktok.png
693 ms
pinterest.png
695 ms
Austria.png
692 ms
Germany.png
694 ms
Netherlands.png
789 ms
Belgium.png
787 ms
France.png
694 ms
Spain.png
693 ms
Italy.png
690 ms
Luxembourg.png
587 ms
Switzerland.png
679 ms
CHilger_2019-01-16_D85_1965-1920x1080-c_1.jpg
673 ms
go_usecase_bulletjournal.jpg
692 ms
logo-emark-create_small.png
594 ms
e-mark-logo_small.png
595 ms
print.min.css
101 ms
e-mark.shop accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
e-mark.shop best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
e-mark.shop SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise E-mark.shop can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that E-mark.shop main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
e-mark.shop
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of E Mark. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: