2.1 sec in total
283 ms
1.4 sec
339 ms
Click here to check amazing E RAMO content for Egypt. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about e-ramo.net
e-RAMO For Digital Solutions, a leading provider of web and mobile app development, digital marketing, and SEO services in Egypt and the Gulf since 2013. We deliver innovative and results-driven solut...
Visit e-ramo.netWe analyzed E-ramo.net page load time and found that the first response time was 283 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
e-ramo.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.6 s
0/100
10%
Value25.2 s
0/100
25%
Value16.7 s
0/100
10%
Value1,350 ms
17/100
30%
Value0.25
50/100
15%
Value25.3 s
0/100
10%
283 ms
101 ms
18 ms
26 ms
92 ms
Our browser made a total of 138 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (99 requests) were addressed to the original E-ramo.net, 15% (21 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (339 ms) belongs to the original domain E-ramo.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.9 MB (48%)
3.9 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of E-ramo.net main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 69.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.5 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. E RAMO images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 860.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 860.9 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 957.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. E-ramo.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 957.7 kB or 91% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 77 (70%)
110
33
The browser has sent 110 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of E RAMO. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 46 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
e-ramo.net
283 ms
adsbygoogle.js
101 ms
js
18 ms
css
26 ms
css
92 ms
plugins-css.css
92 ms
settings.css
143 ms
typography.css
89 ms
shortcodes.css
90 ms
style.css
145 ms
responsive.css
91 ms
loader-17.gif
154 ms
logo.png
142 ms
b894c-Bg.jpg
153 ms
73382-15.png
139 ms
8f4ba-14.png
198 ms
a5c1a-16.png
197 ms
e5039-17.png
199 ms
756d0-9.png
183 ms
ab657-13.png
197 ms
xfbml.customerchat.js
24 ms
fbevents.js
50 ms
ce4ef-12.png
195 ms
7f737-11.png
193 ms
db7df-10.png
201 ms
7c087-6.png
203 ms
5536f-Shadow.png
202 ms
85cc7-5.png
200 ms
2a3ef-4.png
239 ms
2f5f7-7.png
238 ms
ea23f-8.png
239 ms
01.jpg
245 ms
02.jpg
240 ms
03.jpg
301 ms
js
127 ms
jquery-3.3.1.min.js
294 ms
plugins-jquery.js
298 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
294 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
295 ms
revolution.extension.actions.min.js
296 ms
revolution.extension.carousel.min.js
296 ms
revolution.extension.kenburn.min.js
294 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
305 ms
revolution.extension.migration.min.js
308 ms
accordion.css
230 ms
action-box.css
229 ms
blockquote.css
236 ms
bootstrap-typography.css
241 ms
show_ads_impl.js
303 ms
button.css
205 ms
clients.css
192 ms
contact-form.css
195 ms
countdown.css
193 ms
counter.css
196 ms
divider.css
171 ms
js
14 ms
analytics.js
19 ms
dropcap.css
158 ms
feature-text.css
173 ms
list-style.css
168 ms
nice-select.css
168 ms
owl-carousel.css
169 ms
page-title.css
173 ms
pie-chart.css
171 ms
js
55 ms
pricing.css
187 ms
progress-bar.css
184 ms
section-title.css
183 ms
social-icons.css
185 ms
collect
64 ms
tabs.css
153 ms
team.css
156 ms
testimonial.css
161 ms
side-panel.css
178 ms
onload-modal.css
157 ms
collect
30 ms
bootstrap.min.css
177 ms
mega_menu.css
171 ms
animate.css
122 ms
font-awesome.min.css
172 ms
bootstrap-datetimepicker.min.css
123 ms
dataTables.bootstrap4.min.css
171 ms
magnific-popup.css
180 ms
mediaelementplayer.css
181 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
171 ms
slick-theme.css
181 ms
themify-icons.css
197 ms
fullcalendar.css
201 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
197 ms
revolution.extension.parallax.min.js
190 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
189 ms
ga-audiences
157 ms
revolution.extension.video.min.js
251 ms
revolution-custom.js
250 ms
custom.js
250 ms
01.png
249 ms
02.png
245 ms
03.png
244 ms
04.png
238 ms
05.png
237 ms
06.png
237 ms
07.png
232 ms
08.png
230 ms
logo-dark.png
229 ms
02.jpg
339 ms
09.jpg
339 ms
zrt_lookup.html
99 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
117 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
118 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf
123 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf
119 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
118 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
122 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
118 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
122 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf
123 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf
124 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf
122 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf
124 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf
124 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf
124 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf
125 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
126 ms
themify.woff
125 ms
launcher-v2.js
203 ms
328 ms
mega_menu.js
123 ms
jquery.countTo.js
41 ms
owl-carousel.min.js
40 ms
jquery.nicescroll.js
121 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
121 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJ6bQl2xMB.ttf
90 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJ0LQl2xMB.ttf
9 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJt7Ql2xMB.ttf
89 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJBbMl2xMB.ttf
88 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJN7Ml2xMB.ttf
88 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJabMl2xMB.ttf
88 ms
launcher-v2.js
137 ms
e-ramo.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
e-ramo.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
e-ramo.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise E-ramo.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that E-ramo.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
e-ramo.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of E RAMO. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: