Tools & Wizards About Us
eagleowl.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    48% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

eagleowl.in

EagleOwl - Restaurant Operations Management Platform | Increase Profitability & Efficiency

Page Load Speed

5.2 sec in total

First Response

378 ms

Resources Loaded

4.3 sec

Page Rendered

447 ms

eagleowl.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Eagle Owl content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about eagleowl.in

Transform your restaurant operations with EagleOwl. Reduce costs by up to 10%, streamline processes, and increase profitability with our comprehensive restaurant management platform.

Visit eagleowl.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Eagleowl.in page load time and found that the first response time was 378 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

eagleowl.in performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.9 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value780 ms

37/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.7 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

eagleowl.in

378 ms

376 ms

fonts.css

269 ms

2abd264f-1649227884.min.css

371 ms

9f345786-1708274206.min.css

1111 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 39% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Eagleowl.in, 21% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 15% (9 requests) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Eagleowl.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 559.6 kB (45%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

695.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Eagleowl.in main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 425.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 151.2 kB

  • Original 179.3 kB
  • After minification 171.3 kB
  • After compression 28.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 151.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 181.5 kB

  • Original 392.6 kB
  • After minification 211.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Eagle Owl needs image optimization as it can save up to 181.5 kB or 46% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 70.4 kB

  • Original 425.3 kB
  • After minification 425.3 kB
  • After compression 354.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 70.4 kB or 17% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 156.5 kB

  • Original 258.4 kB
  • After minification 111.9 kB
  • After compression 101.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eagleowl.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 156.5 kB or 61% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (80%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eagle Owl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

eagleowl.in

eagleowl.in

378 ms

376 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

269 ms

2abd264f-1649227884.min.css

2abd264f-1649227884.min.css

371 ms

9f345786-1708274206.min.css

9f345786-1708274206.min.css

1111 ms

css

css

45 ms

a16e23db-1644065211.min.css

a16e23db-1644065211.min.css

565 ms

smartslider.min.css

smartslider.min.css

567 ms

07052ee7-1644065219.min.js

07052ee7-1644065219.min.js

942 ms

n2.min.js

n2.min.js

758 ms

smartslider-frontend.min.js

smartslider-frontend.min.js

757 ms

ss-simple.min.js

ss-simple.min.js

748 ms

w-arrow-image.min.js

w-arrow-image.min.js

751 ms

w-thumbnail-horizontal.min.js

w-thumbnail-horizontal.min.js

932 ms

all.css

all.css

44 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

31 ms

webflow.4e55dafc9.js

webflow.4e55dafc9.js

153 ms

d13c0c8c-1644065211.min.css

d13c0c8c-1644065211.min.css

934 ms

4e04767a-1645556043.min.js

4e04767a-1645556043.min.js

1531 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

67 ms

lftracker_v1_YEgkB8lBKK14ep3Z.js

lftracker_v1_YEgkB8lBKK14ep3Z.js

341 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

658 ms

tr-rc.lfeeder.com

tr-rc.lfeeder.com

56 ms

svg%3E

svg%3E

125 ms

doodles-copy.png

doodles-copy.png

628 ms

blue-patterns.png

blue-patterns.png

817 ms

svg%3E

svg%3E

149 ms

JPwQPEoAAAA=

JPwQPEoAAAA=

6 ms

qd+TGu6XJzLwK3qzzXKYeqc+L442CIxHdRkZdbYGaLU7ja73I7tkXbsoSEVVPlx0npf49NDVoVqeB3n9HbGVFAc=

qd+TGu6XJzLwK3qzzXKYeqc+L442CIxHdRkZdbYGaLU7ja73I7tkXbsoSEVVPlx0npf49NDVoVqeB3n9HbGVFAc=

5 ms

Ifbcm+g55tfZq6NuZzgyAZINNFS2paF4HVxSuxAVt5y2H5sgElb4lPAtcHKG03NSMvowLM1c3LrbTpEG1Rfz5aKaO1cAop05VlAFJL5PGZJapMyWhVosSLUQ51lJnV1B7gQ8pZGSYNoHkRa2aU3kaDvp6MDaaeTf3Tg89Sfwv4Ys1qZYA

Ifbcm+g55tfZq6NuZzgyAZINNFS2paF4HVxSuxAVt5y2H5sgElb4lPAtcHKG03NSMvowLM1c3LrbTpEG1Rfz5aKaO1cAop05VlAFJL5PGZJapMyWhVosSLUQ51lJnV1B7gQ8pZGSYNoHkRa2aU3kaDvp6MDaaeTf3Tg89Sfwv4Ys1qZYA

5 ms

R2xlRQH

R2xlRQH

5 ms

EYsybbMyLKU+HULsAS9S8LgPc1kydrSrTsPdmsnrgFhI5pzc2T32clr4YO+S7xEAAA==

EYsybbMyLKU+HULsAS9S8LgPc1kydrSrTsPdmsnrgFhI5pzc2T32clr4YO+S7xEAAA==

5 ms

j00NWhWp4Hef0dsZUUBw==

j00NWhWp4Hef0dsZUUBw==

4 ms

R2xlRQH

R2xlRQH

4 ms

j00NWhWp4Hef0dsZUUBw==

j00NWhWp4Hef0dsZUUBw==

3 ms

R2xlRQH

R2xlRQH

4 ms

elementskit.woff

elementskit.woff

1316 ms

eicons.woff

eicons.woff

565 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

67 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

249 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

67 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

407 ms

group-14.jpg

group-14.jpg

533 ms

svg%3E

svg%3E

33 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

51 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

51 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

85 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf

115 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf

117 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

115 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

114 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf

122 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf

112 ms

u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkV2EH7alwg.ttf

u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkV2EH7alwg.ttf

116 ms

u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkW-EH7alwg.ttf

u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkW-EH7alwg.ttf

117 ms

u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkYODH7alwg.ttf

u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkYODH7alwg.ttf

119 ms

u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkbqDH7alwg.ttf

u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkbqDH7alwg.ttf

118 ms

svg%3E

svg%3E

22 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

77 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

414 ms

b4001280-1573769716.min.css

b4001280-1573769716.min.css

185 ms

widget.js

widget.js

24 ms

Accessibility Review

eagleowl.in accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

eagleowl.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

eagleowl.in SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eagleowl.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eagleowl.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

eagleowl.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Eagle Owl. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: