5.6 sec in total
1.4 sec
3.9 sec
299 ms
Visit eapa.org.uk now to see the best up-to-date Eapa content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about eapa.org.uk
The UK voice of Employee Assistance Programmes raising standards and good mental health. Free to use, return on investment calculator to show the ROI of your EAP
Visit eapa.org.ukWe analyzed Eapa.org.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
eapa.org.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.2 s
0/100
10%
Value23.1 s
0/100
25%
Value24.0 s
0/100
10%
Value2,530 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.168
71/100
15%
Value20.8 s
2/100
10%
1353 ms
27 ms
162 ms
167 ms
172 ms
Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Eapa.org.uk, 10% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (9 requests) were made to Pbs.twimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Eapa.org.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 404.7 kB (24%)
1.7 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Eapa.org.uk main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 20.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.1 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 56.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Eapa images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 231.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 231.8 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 96.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eapa.org.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 96.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (55%)
87
39
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eapa. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 32 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.eapa.org.uk
1353 ms
css
27 ms
styles.css
162 ms
awp-columns.css
167 ms
wen-style.css
172 ms
jquery.js
429 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
201 ms
widgetkit-52ab3119.css
300 ms
widgetkit-87df54ec.js
244 ms
base.css
248 ms
layout.css
256 ms
menus.css
290 ms
modules.css
329 ms
tools.css
331 ms
system.css
343 ms
extensions.css
379 ms
custom.css
391 ms
arial.css
412 ms
arial.css
415 ms
style.css
461 ms
responsive.css
467 ms
print.css
482 ms
warp.js
496 ms
responsive.js
498 ms
accordionmenu.js
510 ms
dropdownmenu.js
512 ms
template.js
558 ms
search.js
573 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
552 ms
jquery.form.min.js
596 ms
scripts.js
530 ms
logout.js
533 ms
custom.js
580 ms
lightbox.js
219 ms
mediaelement-and-player.js
376 ms
spotlight.js
234 ms
base.css
237 ms
layout.css
286 ms
menus.css
293 ms
modules.css
307 ms
tools.css
319 ms
system.css
322 ms
system.css
377 ms
system-all.css
378 ms
responsive.css
389 ms
print.css
382 ms
bg.jpg
272 ms
logo.png
275 ms
searchbox_magnifier.png
272 ms
tweeterHeader.png
273 ms
sl1new.png
516 ms
about1.jpg
273 ms
eap-provider2.jpg
298 ms
joinup2.jpg
358 ms
nav.png
263 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBobN6UDyHWBl620a-IRfuBk.woff
24 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxh_xHqYgAV9Bl_ZQbYUxnQU.woff
26 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxn5HxGBcBvicCpTp6spHfNo.woff
30 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxjqR_3kx9_hJXbbyU8S6IN0.woff
30 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxkCDe67GEgBv_HnyvHTfdew.woff
28 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
28 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
28 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
26 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
28 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
29 ms
widgets.js
16 ms
bottombgheading.png
265 ms
footer_address.png
319 ms
footer_email.png
319 ms
footer_twitter.png
321 ms
totop_scroller.png
321 ms
analytics.js
190 ms
slideshow.js
156 ms
ajax-loader.gif
130 ms
timeline.d11f7a3b3287fb94220e8ee6d03cc772.js
29 ms
collect
14 ms
collect
7 ms
syndication
96 ms
526674857010806784
241 ms
sl2new.png
517 ms
Banner_image1.png
388 ms
proxy.jpg
25 ms
proxy.jpg
19 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
5 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
8 ms
eaef_square_normal.jpg
57 ms
eVf33SI6_normal.jpg
55 ms
H_W_Logo_Twitter_2_normal.JPG
53 ms
EAPA_International_Logo_normal.jpg
54 ms
Eugene_Farrell_normal.jpg
115 ms
imgwqu4f_normal.jpeg
52 ms
CdBH76uXEAAUfmU.jpg:small
109 ms
CdFp2GQWAAEr8Df.jpg:small
110 ms
CdCcl6OWEAAYZAl.jpg:small
63 ms
syndication_bundle_v1_64fcb3dd2f6da5b5f976d91a319ef73e329c1a5d.css
44 ms
syndication_bundle_v1_64fcb3dd2f6da5b5f976d91a319ef73e329c1a5d.css
91 ms
proxy.jpg
6 ms
proxy.jpg
4 ms
eapa.org.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
eapa.org.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
eapa.org.uk SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eapa.org.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eapa.org.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eapa.org.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Eapa. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: