Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 43

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 42

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    18% of websites

earlbox.com

EARL.BOX

Page Load Speed

30.7 sec in total

First Response

2 sec

Resources Loaded

5.1 sec

Page Rendered

23.7 sec

earlbox.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to earlbox.com homepage info - get ready to check EARL BOX best content for Japan right away, or after learning these important things about earlbox.com

Visit earlbox.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Earlbox.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2 sec and then it took 28.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

earlbox.com performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

43/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

56/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

74/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value770 ms

38/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.277

44/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.2 s

74/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

earlbox.com

1967 ms

l.j

478 ms

728_90.jpg

1034 ms

41.gif

613 ms

160228a.jpg

1350 ms

Our browser made a total of 324 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Earlbox.com, 50% (163 requests) were made to Img.dlsite.jp and 13% (43 requests) were made to Image.getchu.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) relates to the external source Earlbox2.sakura.ne.jp.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 373.0 kB (3%)

Content Size

12.4 MB

After Optimization

12.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Earlbox.com main page is 12.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 12.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 200.5 kB

  • Original 260.4 kB
  • After minification 259.4 kB
  • After compression 59.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 200.5 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 159.0 kB

  • Original 12.1 MB
  • After minification 12.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. EARL BOX images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 12.1 kB

  • Original 19.2 kB
  • After minification 19.0 kB
  • After compression 7.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 12.1 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 1.8 kB
  • After minification 1.1 kB
  • After compression 380 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Earlbox.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.4 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (4%)

Requests Now

316

After Optimization

302

The browser has sent 316 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EARL BOX. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

earlbox.com accessibility score

43

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best Practices

earlbox.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

earlbox.com SEO score

42

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Document uses plugins

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    SHIFT_JIS

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Earlbox.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Earlbox.com main page’s claimed encoding is shift_jis. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of EARL BOX. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: