Report Summary

  • 87

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    90% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    82% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

easapart66.academy

EASA Part 66 Exam Modules Question Papers, Ebook and traning Quiz

Page Load Speed

6.3 sec in total

First Response

219 ms

Resources Loaded

3.8 sec

Page Rendered

2.3 sec

easapart66.academy screenshot

About Website

Visit easapart66.academy now to see the best up-to-date EASA Part 66 content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about easapart66.academy

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ EASA PART66 Exam Questions questions powerd by EASA PART 66 ACADEMY quiz and questions Papers, book and Ebook to training for easly

Visit easapart66.academy

Key Findings

We analyzed Easapart66.academy page load time and found that the first response time was 219 ms and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

easapart66.academy performance score

87

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

89/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

59/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.4 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.111

87/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.9 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

easapart66.academy

219 ms

easapart66.academy

765 ms

icon-search.svg

142 ms

js

198 ms

jquery.selectBox.min.js

118 ms

Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original Easapart66.academy, 7% (6 requests) were made to Demo.wpthemego.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Easapart66.academy.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 622.6 kB (68%)

Content Size

915.1 kB

After Optimization

292.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Easapart66.academy main page is 915.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 702.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 606.0 kB

  • Original 702.6 kB
  • After minification 702.6 kB
  • After compression 96.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 606.0 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 16.6 kB

  • Original 211.3 kB
  • After minification 194.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. EASA Part 66 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 70 B

  • Original 1.2 kB
  • After minification 1.2 kB
  • After compression 1.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (84%)

Requests Now

62

After Optimization

10

The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EASA Part 66. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 53 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

easapart66.academy accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

easapart66.academy best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

easapart66.academy SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Easapart66.academy can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Easapart66.academy main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of EASA Part 66. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: