3.3 sec in total
109 ms
2.4 sec
815 ms
Visit ecommand.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date E Command content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ecommand.co.uk
If you are looking for a CS-cart developer, an E-Commerce developer or a marketplace developer then visit us here at e:command.
Visit ecommand.co.ukWe analyzed Ecommand.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 109 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
ecommand.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
67/100
10%
Value6.7 s
7/100
25%
Value5.5 s
54/100
10%
Value1,410 ms
15/100
30%
Value0.051
99/100
15%
Value9.4 s
30/100
10%
109 ms
48 ms
41 ms
34 ms
37 ms
Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (84 requests) were addressed to the original Ecommand.co.uk, 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to My.hellobar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Ecommand.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 172.8 kB (10%)
1.7 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Ecommand.co.uk main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 141.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 141.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. E Command images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 403 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 747 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ecommand.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (65%)
88
31
The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of E Command. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ecommand.co.uk
109 ms
ecommand.co.uk
48 ms
style.min.css
41 ms
theme.min.css
34 ms
frontend.min.css
37 ms
post-6.css
34 ms
widget-image.min.css
60 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
35 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
53 ms
widget-form.min.css
52 ms
widget-heading.min.css
57 ms
swiper.min.css
65 ms
e-swiper.min.css
58 ms
popup.min.css
72 ms
widget-text-editor.min.css
107 ms
shapes.min.css
80 ms
widget-menu-anchor.min.css
79 ms
widget-icon-box.min.css
98 ms
e-animation-grow.min.css
108 ms
widget-testimonial-carousel.min.css
88 ms
widget-carousel-module-base.min.css
117 ms
widget-image-carousel.min.css
101 ms
post-129.css
109 ms
post-36.css
134 ms
post-32.css
127 ms
css
41 ms
script.min.js
139 ms
jquery.min.js
128 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
125 ms
js
83 ms
18247871d0bbd9db118f7387120d8b7444ff5c76.js
60 ms
js
199 ms
post-15.css
134 ms
rotateInDownLeft.min.css
196 ms
zoomIn.min.css
197 ms
rotateInUpLeft.min.css
195 ms
motion-fx.min.css
197 ms
sticky.min.css
200 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
197 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
198 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
199 ms
vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015
45 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
197 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
173 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
197 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
189 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
176 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
189 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
176 ms
hooks.min.js
175 ms
i18n.min.js
177 ms
frontend.min.js
178 ms
core.min.js
176 ms
frontend.min.js
169 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
169 ms
underscore.min.js
189 ms
wp-util.min.js
155 ms
frontend.min.js
155 ms
matomo.js
104 ms
ecommand-Logo-Finalwhite300.png
233 ms
BG-HomePage-High.png
218 ms
AdobeStock_496186454-scaled.webp
190 ms
BG-home-new4.png
197 ms
AdobeStock_436876159-1-scaled.jpeg
114 ms
Shapes-icons.png
224 ms
BG-Testemonials-home-page.png
278 ms
air-con-jpeg-1.webp
215 ms
biosynergy.webp
303 ms
bmw-1.png
393 ms
modules-v2.js
28 ms
metpolice.webp
384 ms
imperialbrands.webp
313 ms
homeoffice.webp
321 ms
heinz-jpeg-1.webp
367 ms
gsk.webp
459 ms
fujitsu.webp
429 ms
dhl.webp
489 ms
city-jpeg-1.webp
520 ms
MS.webp
656 ms
nhs-jpeg-1.webp
502 ms
tassimo.webp
555 ms
unilev.webp
556 ms
whibleys-jpeg-1.webp
635 ms
virgin-media.png
676 ms
CTA-Shapes.png
633 ms
AdobeStock_506324444-scaled.jpeg
728 ms
ecommandlogo300.png
683 ms
small_c_popup-q7nryzv19e3rphuy7mmhxtox74sihz0rnhzutgdum4.png
741 ms
w8gdH283Tvk__Lua32TysjIfp8uJ.woff
16 ms
matomo.php
1969 ms
main.js
7 ms
ecommand.co.uk accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
ecommand.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
ecommand.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ecommand.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ecommand.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ecommand.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of E Command. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: