598 ms in total
8 ms
485 ms
105 ms
Visit edamam.com now to see the best up-to-date Edamam content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about edamam.com
Food database and nutrition data provider to wellness and health applications. Try our Food Database API, Nutrition Analysis API and Recipe Search API.
Visit edamam.comWe analyzed Edamam.com page load time and found that the first response time was 8 ms and then it took 590 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.
edamam.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
29/100
10%
Value14.8 s
0/100
25%
Value7.6 s
26/100
10%
Value670 ms
44/100
30%
Value0.068
96/100
15%
Value13.2 s
12/100
10%
8 ms
54 ms
11 ms
54 ms
55 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Edamam.com, 7% (3 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (263 ms) relates to the external source Connect.facebook.net.
Page size can be reduced by 401.3 kB (68%)
594.4 kB
193.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Edamam.com main page is 594.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 365.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.4 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.4 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Edamam needs image optimization as it can save up to 19.0 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 262.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 262.4 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 103.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Edamam.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 103.5 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (28%)
43
31
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Edamam. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
edamam.com
8 ms
www.edamam.com
54 ms
general.css
11 ms
jquery.jscrollpane.css
54 ms
jquery-1.8.1.min.js
55 ms
autocomplete.js
54 ms
jquery.mousewheel.js
67 ms
jquery.jscrollpane.min.js
66 ms
general.js
69 ms
html2canvas.js
68 ms
api:client.js
121 ms
css
93 ms
tooltip.js
8 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
84 ms
pattern-bgr-site.jpg
81 ms
all.js
263 ms
analytics.js
106 ms
nav-click.jsp
17 ms
search
38 ms
logo-site-header.png
37 ms
gradient-btn-orang.png
45 ms
gradient-btn-white.png
46 ms
bullet-x-16.png
38 ms
gradient-search-btn.png
44 ms
bullet-magnifier-search-home.png
39 ms
bullet-arrow-filters-switchers.png
40 ms
bullet-arrow-filters.png
41 ms
btn-feedback.png
42 ms
ico-nav-1-active.png
41 ms
ico-nav-2.png
43 ms
ico-nav-3.png
44 ms
set-icons-networks.png
45 ms
set-icons-apps.png
47 ms
ico-nav-2-over.png
46 ms
ico-nav-2-over-100.png
45 ms
ico-nav-2-over-200.png
48 ms
ico-nav-3-over.png
46 ms
ico-nav-3-over-100.png
48 ms
ico-nav-3-over-200.png
49 ms
set-icons-menu.png
45 ms
postmessageRelay
59 ms
collect
29 ms
api.js
52 ms
core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js
79 ms
2536007149-postmessagerelay.js
59 ms
collect
64 ms
edamam.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
ARIA toggle fields do not have accessible names
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
edamam.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
edamam.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Edamam.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Edamam.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
edamam.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Edamam. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: