Tools & Wizards About Us
edinoepole.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

edinoepole.ru

Единое Поле - единая билетная система (касса, сайт, агенты) для учета и самостоятельных продаж билетов.

Page Load Speed

5.9 sec in total

First Response

525 ms

Resources Loaded

4.5 sec

Page Rendered

877 ms

edinoepole.ru screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Edinoepole content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about edinoepole.ru

Профессиональный сервис для продажи и учета билетов. Максимальное количество каналов продаж в едином билетном пространстве. Подходит для ГБУК и любого вида бизнеса. Простая интеграция, бесплатное подк...

Visit edinoepole.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Edinoepole.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 525 ms and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

edinoepole.ru performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

17/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

33/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value440 ms

64/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.4 s

24/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

edinoepole.ru

525 ms

edinoepole.ru

895 ms

application-771699b30b199104f79ececea30ae0e95b782a01f6eecab966994a52bda08ebb.css

247 ms

application-b11d180fa456d9059dc7f1324c9d532d411b3627c3154fccdd40e613e1ec910e.js

495 ms

conversion.js

90 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Edinoepole.ru, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Edinoepole.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 330.6 kB (48%)

Content Size

688.7 kB

After Optimization

358.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Edinoepole.ru main page is 688.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 352.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 46.8 kB

  • Original 62.6 kB
  • After minification 62.6 kB
  • After compression 15.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.8 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 76.1 kB

  • Original 222.9 kB
  • After minification 146.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Edinoepole needs image optimization as it can save up to 76.1 kB or 34% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 166.2 kB

  • Original 352.7 kB
  • After minification 352.7 kB
  • After compression 186.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 166.2 kB or 47% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 41.6 kB

  • Original 50.5 kB
  • After minification 50.1 kB
  • After compression 8.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Edinoepole.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 41.6 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (12%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

37

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Edinoepole. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

edinoepole.ru

edinoepole.ru

525 ms

edinoepole.ru

edinoepole.ru

895 ms

application-771699b30b199104f79ececea30ae0e95b782a01f6eecab966994a52bda08ebb.css

application-771699b30b199104f79ececea30ae0e95b782a01f6eecab966994a52bda08ebb.css

247 ms

application-b11d180fa456d9059dc7f1324c9d532d411b3627c3154fccdd40e613e1ec910e.js

application-b11d180fa456d9059dc7f1324c9d532d411b3627c3154fccdd40e613e1ec910e.js

495 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

90 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

138 ms

theatre.svg

theatre.svg

139 ms

concert.svg

concert.svg

139 ms

club.svg

club.svg

260 ms

festival.svg

festival.svg

265 ms

sport.svg

sport.svg

266 ms

tours.svg

tours.svg

619 ms

business.svg

business.svg

620 ms

project.svg

project.svg

621 ms

kassir.svg

kassir.svg

622 ms

electro.svg

electro.svg

775 ms

bron.png

bron.png

779 ms

vsmeirhold.png

vsmeirhold.png

863 ms

dram.svg

dram.svg

744 ms

nn.png

nn.png

875 ms

chechov.png

chechov.png

877 ms

sk.png

sk.png

867 ms

theatre-atelie.png

theatre-atelie.png

913 ms

kodt.png

kodt.png

1056 ms

yellow-dots.svg

yellow-dots.svg

1108 ms

module1_v1.gif

module1_v1.gif

1732 ms

module2_v1.gif

module2_v1.gif

1937 ms

module3_v1.gif

module3_v1.gif

1772 ms

module4_v1.gif

module4_v1.gif

2297 ms

module5_v1.gif

module5_v1.gif

2308 ms

module6_v1.gif

module6_v1.gif

2085 ms

module7_v1.gif

module7_v1.gif

1978 ms

2x.svg

2x.svg

1900 ms

calendar.svg

calendar.svg

2028 ms

logo-dark.svg

logo-dark.svg

2192 ms

tag.js

tag.js

876 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

51 ms

77 ms

clock.svg

clock.svg

1994 ms

ralewaymedium.woff

ralewaymedium.woff

2178 ms

ralewayregular.woff

ralewayregular.woff

2221 ms

ralewaylight.woff

ralewaylight.woff

2239 ms

ralewayextralight.woff

ralewayextralight.woff

2338 ms

ralewaythin.woff

ralewaythin.woff

2435 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

ralewaysemibold.woff

ralewaysemibold.woff

2433 ms

ralewaybold.woff

ralewaybold.woff

2459 ms

ralewayextrabold.woff

ralewayextrabold.woff

2440 ms

js

js

71 ms

42 ms

ralewayblack.woff

ralewayblack.woff

2337 ms

advert.gif

advert.gif

591 ms

1

1

136 ms

Accessibility Review

edinoepole.ru accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

edinoepole.ru best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

edinoepole.ru SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Edinoepole.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Edinoepole.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

edinoepole.ru

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Edinoepole. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: