1.5 sec in total
33 ms
1.3 sec
172 ms
Visit editlib.org now to see the best up-to-date Edit Lib content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about editlib.org
Visit editlib.orgWe analyzed Editlib.org page load time and found that the first response time was 33 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
editlib.org performance score
33 ms
20 ms
412 ms
56 ms
65 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Editlib.org, 62% (48 requests) were made to Editlib-static.s3.amazonaws.com and 10% (8 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (558 ms) relates to the external source Editlib-static.s3.amazonaws.com.
Page size can be reduced by 42.6 kB (10%)
421.9 kB
379.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Editlib.org main page is 421.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 320.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.4 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Edit Lib images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 4.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Editlib.org has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (18%)
67
55
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Edit Lib. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
editlib.org
33 ms
editlib.org
20 ms
www.learntechlib.org
412 ms
css
56 ms
site.css.gz
65 ms
font-awesome.min.css
50 ms
slick.css
243 ms
slick-theme.css
82 ms
classic-10_7.css
47 ms
jquery.min.js
78 ms
bootstrap.min.js
80 ms
bootstrap-sidemenu.js.gz
79 ms
slick.js
213 ms
traffic.js.gz
76 ms
j.php
269 ms
fbevents.js
204 ms
logo-ltl.png
174 ms
JILR-rr.png
453 ms
athabasca.png
168 ms
az-state.png
168 ms
boston.png
227 ms
chinesehk.png
235 ms
citylondon.png
234 ms
curtin.png
334 ms
duisburg.png
331 ms
edith-cowan.png
331 ms
fernuni.gif
333 ms
gothenburg.png
334 ms
harvard-gse.png
426 ms
hong-kong-ie.png
427 ms
hong-kong-polyu.png
426 ms
kansai.png
437 ms
lau.png
437 ms
maastrict.jpeg
426 ms
macquarie.png
470 ms
mcgill.png
473 ms
memorial.jpg
472 ms
natl-chiao-tung.png
470 ms
ntnu.png
473 ms
open-hong-kong.jpg
481 ms
purdue.png
474 ms
simon-fraser.png
504 ms
stanford.png
479 ms
alberta.png
474 ms
auckland.jpg
474 ms
hawaii-manoa.gif
529 ms
johannesburg.png
494 ms
laval.png
499 ms
lethbridge.png
498 ms
lisboa.png
515 ms
penn.png
508 ms
ubc.png
524 ms
unisa.png
558 ms
thumbnail_224435.jpg
433 ms
thumbnail_224396.jpg
433 ms
thumbnail_224392.jpg
430 ms
thumbnail_224391.jpg
431 ms
ajax-loader.gif
322 ms
ga.js
224 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
163 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
219 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
219 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
295 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBO5Xk.ttf
298 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpcBO5Xk.ttf
301 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoa4Omb2Rm.ttf
298 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmb2Rm.ttf
299 ms
geneve.gif
392 ms
quebec.png
371 ms
vienna.png
372 ms
ut-austin.png
322 ms
utm.png
321 ms
v.gif
119 ms
uva.png
305 ms
zayed.png
239 ms
facebook-logo.png
223 ms
twitter-logo.png
227 ms
__utm.gif
65 ms
editlib.org SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Editlib.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Editlib.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
editlib.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Edit Lib. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: