Tools & Wizards About Us
edmundoretama.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 66

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 48% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

edmundoretama.com

【バイテックの口コミ】悪い評判は本当？効果と無料体験の勧誘

Page Load Speed

757 ms in total

First Response

191 ms

Resources Loaded

447 ms

Page Rendered

119 ms

edmundoretama.com screenshot

About Website

Visit edmundoretama.com now to see the best up-to-date Edmundoretama content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about edmundoretama.com

バイオテックの口コミで「効果がない」とか「無料体験で勧誘された」など悪い評判は本当が検証しました。気になる料金や解約方法も開設しています。「もみだし洗いが気持ちい」「スタッフが美人」という評判もあるようです。その実態は？

Visit edmundoretama.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Edmundoretama.com page load time and found that the first response time was 191 ms and then it took 566 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

edmundoretama.com performance score

66

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

46/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

50/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

50/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.376

28/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.1 s

95/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

edmundoretama.com

191 ms

style.css

34 ms

jquery-latest.pack.js

7 ms

jquery.countdown.js

112 ms

jcarousellite1.0.1_min.js

86 ms

Our browser made a total of 18 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Edmundoretama.com, 17% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 6% (1 request) were made to Code.jquery.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (191 ms) belongs to the original domain Edmundoretama.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 48.2 kB (42%)

Content Size

114.7 kB

After Optimization

66.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Edmundoretama.com main page is 114.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 53.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 11.9 kB

  • Original 13.9 kB
  • After minification 6.9 kB
  • After compression 2.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.0 kB, which is 50% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.9 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 10.9 kB

  • Original 53.1 kB
  • After minification 42.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Edmundoretama needs image optimization as it can save up to 10.9 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-51%

Potential reduce by 21.9 kB

  • Original 43.1 kB
  • After minification 31.4 kB
  • After compression 21.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 21.9 kB or 51% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 3.5 kB

  • Original 4.6 kB
  • After minification 3.6 kB
  • After compression 1.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Edmundoretama.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.5 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (18%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Edmundoretama. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

edmundoretama.com

edmundoretama.com

191 ms

style.css

style.css

34 ms

jquery-latest.pack.js

jquery-latest.pack.js

7 ms

jquery.countdown.js

jquery.countdown.js

112 ms

jcarousellite1.0.1_min.js

jcarousellite1.0.1_min.js

86 ms

ga.js

ga.js

30 ms

background_gradient.png

background_gradient.png

52 ms

logo.png

logo.png

53 ms

page_background.png

page_background.png

53 ms

counter_bg.png

counter_bg.png

72 ms

prev.png

prev.png

67 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

69 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

98 ms

wordpress-logo.png

wordpress-logo.png

91 ms

mailform_background.png

mailform_background.png

96 ms

next.png

next.png

102 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

12 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

11 ms

Accessibility Review

edmundoretama.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

edmundoretama.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

edmundoretama.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Edmundoretama.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Edmundoretama.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

edmundoretama.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Edmundoretama. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: