6.4 sec in total
167 ms
5 sec
1.2 sec
Click here to check amazing Edology content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about edology.com
Find your online course with Edology. Study the accounting qualifications ACCA, or choose an online MBA, Masters, Bachelors programme.
Visit edology.comWe analyzed Edology.com page load time and found that the first response time was 167 ms and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
edology.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.1 s
3/100
10%
Value10.0 s
0/100
25%
Value19.9 s
0/100
10%
Value43,660 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.09
92/100
15%
Value59.6 s
0/100
10%
167 ms
259 ms
232 ms
235 ms
27 ms
Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 45% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Edology.com, 8% (8 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net and 5% (5 requests) were made to Enrol.studyinteractive.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source T.co.
Page size can be reduced by 933.3 kB (71%)
1.3 MB
372.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Edology.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 896.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 896.1 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Edology needs image optimization as it can save up to 32.5 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 4.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (61%)
83
32
The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Edology. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 43 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
edology.com
167 ms
www.edology.com
259 ms
gtm.js
232 ms
j.php
235 ms
vendors.js
27 ms
app.js
113 ms
home.js
107 ms
webFontLoader.js
147 ms
edology-custom.js
502 ms
widget.js
152 ms
1007-edology-homepage-header-02.jpg
152 ms
logo-bg-white.svg
154 ms
logo-bg-color.svg
156 ms
sprite.svg
157 ms
log_mob.png
167 ms
brand-bradford.png
168 ms
ulaw.png
167 ms
ULaw%20Business.png
166 ms
lcca.png
173 ms
lsbf.png
172 ms
kpmg.png
171 ms
uninnetunno.png
171 ms
gbs.png
171 ms
iam.png
170 ms
arden.png
277 ms
v.gif
28 ms
bat.js
265 ms
insight.min.js
249 ms
pixel
130 ms
uwt.js
677 ms
iframe_api
906 ms
fbevents.js
655 ms
_dmpt.js
892 ms
adalyser.js
1435 ms
tag4arm.js
1159 ms
bzbg5fekdr
887 ms
stub.js
1157 ms
events.js
1157 ms
events.js
1154 ms
hotjar-2272981.js
1153 ms
js
251 ms
activityi;src=8435754;type=arden;cat=arden0;ord=2222125751432;gtm=2wga50;auiddc=291761733.1665042413;u1=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.edology.com%2F;~oref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.edology.com%2F
883 ms
css
892 ms
playfair_displayregular.woff
436 ms
playfair_displaybold.woff
435 ms
playfair_displayblack.woff
433 ms
Raleway-Regular.woff
434 ms
Raleway-Medium.woff
434 ms
Raleway-Light.woff
433 ms
Raleway-SemiBold.woff
761 ms
Raleway-Bold.woff
762 ms
5255885.js
306 ms
5255885
517 ms
101956196802653
441 ms
Helveticaneuecyr-Medium.woff
287 ms
Helveticaneuecyr-Light.woff
285 ms
Helveticaneuecyr-Bold.woff
287 ms
oct.js
271 ms
adsct
1484 ms
adsct
1483 ms
www-widgetapi.js
506 ms
clarity.js
501 ms
sdk.js
470 ms
520 ms
sprite.svg
511 ms
jquery.min.js
1043 ms
tag4arm.php
990 ms
tag4armcheck.php
1279 ms
modules.cbd9768ba80ba0be5b17.js
1291 ms
1476660799046167
885 ms
iubenda_cs.js
843 ms
box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html
1163 ms
sdk.js
963 ms
p
775 ms
IBM.svg
539 ms
lsbf.svg
799 ms
EICT.svg
533 ms
ABC.svg
512 ms
arden.svg
794 ms
checkmark.svg
494 ms
graduation-cap.svg
775 ms
calendar.svg
778 ms
refresh.svg
775 ms
raven.min.js
394 ms
adsct
343 ms
adsct
339 ms
src=8435754;type=arden;cat=arden0;ord=2222125751432;gtm=2wga50;auiddc=291761733.1665042413;u1=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.edology.com%2F;~oref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.edology.com%2F
304 ms
754646091846491
496 ms
core-en.js
239 ms
1632487680204368
210 ms
jquery-ui-1.7.3.custom.min.js
667 ms
37698699.js
279 ms
645933813093067
349 ms
69 ms
edology-widget.js
408 ms
198 ms
initwidget
200 ms
edology.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
edology.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
edology.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Edology.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Edology.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
edology.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Edology. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: