5.1 sec in total
16 ms
4.9 sec
215 ms
Visit edwardberger.com now to see the best up-to-date Edward Berger content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about edwardberger.com
Visit edwardberger.comWe analyzed Edwardberger.com page load time and found that the first response time was 16 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
edwardberger.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value7.5 s
4/100
25%
Value5.4 s
56/100
10%
Value180 ms
92/100
30%
Value0.092
92/100
15%
Value7.5 s
48/100
10%
16 ms
906 ms
100 ms
165 ms
263 ms
Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Edwardberger.com, 92% (86 requests) were made to Maritzasbridal.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) relates to the external source Maritzasbridal.com.
Page size can be reduced by 603.1 kB (44%)
1.4 MB
779.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Edwardberger.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 564.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 86.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 86.0 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Edward Berger images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 232.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 232.0 kB or 41% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 285.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Edwardberger.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 285.1 kB or 58% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 72 (86%)
84
12
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Edward Berger. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 38 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
edwardberger.com
16 ms
906 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
100 ms
font-awesome.min.css
165 ms
fullmain.min.css
263 ms
style.css
193 ms
style.min.css
270 ms
vendors-style.css
196 ms
style.css
256 ms
classic-themes.min.css
229 ms
styles-frontend.min.css
261 ms
simple-event-planner-public.css
329 ms
font-awesome.min.css
294 ms
woocommerce-wishlists.min.css
321 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
320 ms
woocommerce.css
322 ms
styles.min.css
327 ms
dashicons.min.css
360 ms
css
16 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
386 ms
animations.min.css
386 ms
frontend-legacy.min.css
384 ms
frontend.min.css
400 ms
post-9757.css
400 ms
frontend.min.css
443 ms
all.min.css
464 ms
v4-shims.min.css
457 ms
post-9863.css
451 ms
style.css
463 ms
lightslider.css
462 ms
gts-style.css
507 ms
css
30 ms
style.css
510 ms
jquery.min.js
579 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
527 ms
core.min.js
529 ms
mouse.min.js
523 ms
slider.min.js
570 ms
datepicker.min.js
576 ms
font-awesome.min.css
39 ms
jr-insta.css
577 ms
instag-slider.css
503 ms
wis-header.css
438 ms
tippy.css
455 ms
animate.css
466 ms
fullmain.min.js
498 ms
v4-shims.min.js
399 ms
svgxuse.js
390 ms
lightslider.min.js
390 ms
dynamic-conditions-public.js
448 ms
functions-frontend.min.js
426 ms
bootstrap-modal.js
491 ms
woocommerce-wishlists.js
490 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
485 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
487 ms
js.cookie.min.js
481 ms
woocommerce.min.js
451 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
429 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
427 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
426 ms
global.js
490 ms
headhesive.min.js
486 ms
responsive-menu.js
439 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
438 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
431 ms
tippy.min.js
428 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
458 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
451 ms
frontend.min.js
480 ms
dialog.min.js
398 ms
waypoints.min.js
395 ms
swiper.min.js
409 ms
share-link.min.js
483 ms
frontend.min.js
474 ms
cropped-Maritza_Logo_color.jpg
209 ms
symbol-defs.svg
176 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTD-JqaE0lP.ttf
15 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDH52aE0lP.ttf
15 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
335 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
334 ms
warning.png
261 ms
woocommerce-placeholder.png
240 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
23 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
238 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
305 ms
www.maritzasbridal.com
2751 ms
frontend-msie.min.css
69 ms
EB9177C-108X108-400x400.jpg
67 ms
EB9179C-IVSV-400x400.jpg
65 ms
EB9249F-400x400.jpg
73 ms
EB9252C-400x400.jpg
70 ms
EB168-CLSV-400x400.jpg
67 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
66 ms
edwardberger.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
edwardberger.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
edwardberger.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Edwardberger.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Edwardberger.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
edwardberger.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Edward Berger. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: