3 sec in total
330 ms
815 ms
1.8 sec
Welcome to edwardmarks.com homepage info - get ready to check Edwardmarks best content right away, or after learning these important things about edwardmarks.com
Tumblr. Pure effervescent enrichment. Old internet energy. Home of the Reblogs. All the art you never knew you needed. All the fandoms you could wish for. Enough memes to knock out a moderately-sized ...
Visit edwardmarks.comWe analyzed Edwardmarks.com page load time and found that the first response time was 330 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
edwardmarks.com performance score
330 ms
5 ms
9 ms
8 ms
154 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Edwardmarks.com, 21% (8 requests) were made to Assets.tumblr.com and 11% (4 requests) were made to 33.media.tumblr.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (330 ms) relates to the external source Blog.edwardmarks.com.
Page size can be reduced by 417.9 kB (34%)
1.2 MB
800.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Edwardmarks.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 651.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 38.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.7 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 59.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Edwardmarks images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 319.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 319.2 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 384 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Edwardmarks.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 384 B or 59% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (30%)
37
26
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Edwardmarks. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
blog.edwardmarks.com
330 ms
pre_tumblelog.js
5 ms
tumblelog_post_message_queue.js
9 ms
stylesheet.css
8 ms
widgets.js
154 ms
tumblr_inline_mtepss29T71qhi96o.png
180 ms
tumblr_m9uzg6WsHJ1qhi96o.png
25 ms
tumblr_m9uzgoCI4q1qhi96o.png
142 ms
tumblr_m9uzhp3OcV1qhi96o.png
23 ms
tumblr_m9uzygqOgz1qhi96o.png
24 ms
tumblr_m8o69edbAu1qhi96o.png
24 ms
tumblr_inline_mtfvdutJWt1qhi96o.png
203 ms
tumblr_m9uzfubMfE1qhi96o.png
246 ms
tumblr_m9uzsphs661qhi96o.png
265 ms
tumblr_m8o66nvIN81qhi96o.png
244 ms
tumblr_m8o67bu2C51qhi96o.png
244 ms
tumblr_m8yrc60Z2a1qhi96o.png
268 ms
tumblr_m8yrcmTPun1qhi96o.png
265 ms
tumblr_m8o7giFwNk1qhi96o.png
304 ms
tumblr_m9uzsw5yQ91qhi96o.png
137 ms
ga.js
20 ms
impixu
189 ms
index.js
53 ms
tumblr_m8o6a1YyR41qhi96o.png
291 ms
impixu
209 ms
analytics.html
156 ms
__utm.gif
106 ms
login_check.html
36 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
165 ms
rapid-3.36.js
62 ms
rapidworker-1.2.js
61 ms
ga.js
39 ms
analytics.js
66 ms
cs.js
77 ms
__utm.gif
23 ms
follow_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
53 ms
__utm.gif
5 ms
cedexis.radar.js
4 ms
edwardmarks.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Edwardmarks.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Edwardmarks.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
edwardmarks.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Edwardmarks. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: