Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 57% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

edwardreep.com

Edward Reep (1918-2013)

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

193 ms

Resources Loaded

680 ms

Page Rendered

305 ms

edwardreep.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to edwardreep.com homepage info - get ready to check Edward Reep best content right away, or after learning these important things about edwardreep.com

Edward Reep is a major, 20th Century American artist who has brought serious water media painting into the ranks of significant academic and professional discussion, with a body of work stretching fro...

Visit edwardreep.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Edwardreep.com page load time and found that the first response time was 193 ms and then it took 985 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

edwardreep.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.2 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.4 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.6 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

edwardreep.com

193 ms

reset.css

74 ms

css

25 ms

style2.css

76 ms

jquery-1.7.1.js

77 ms

Our browser made a total of 9 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Edwardreep.com, 22% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 11% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (411 ms) belongs to the original domain Edwardreep.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 30.6 kB (2%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Edwardreep.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 2.2 kB

  • Original 3.6 kB
  • After minification 3.1 kB
  • After compression 1.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 513 B, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 2.2 kB or 60% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 26.5 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Edward Reep images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 34 B

  • Original 17.2 kB
  • After minification 17.2 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 2.7 kB
  • After minification 2.0 kB
  • After compression 923 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Edwardreep.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.8 kB or 66% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

7

After Optimization

7

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Edward Reep. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

edwardreep.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

edwardreep.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

edwardreep.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Edwardreep.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Edwardreep.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Edward Reep. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: