3.3 sec in total
167 ms
2 sec
1.1 sec
Visit eeingleton.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date EE Ingleton content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about eeingleton.co.uk
With 48+ years of industry expertise, EE Ingleton Engineering stands as a top UK manufacturer of beaters, swing hammers, screens, and wear parts.
Visit eeingleton.co.ukWe analyzed Eeingleton.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 167 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
eeingleton.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
70/100
10%
Value9.0 s
1/100
25%
Value4.2 s
77/100
10%
Value430 ms
65/100
30%
Value0.448
20/100
15%
Value6.4 s
59/100
10%
167 ms
420 ms
79 ms
158 ms
232 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 99% of them (77 requests) were addressed to the original Eeingleton.co.uk, 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (759 ms) belongs to the original domain Eeingleton.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 223.7 kB (10%)
2.3 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Eeingleton.co.uk main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 145.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 145.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 47.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. EE Ingleton images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 18.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 18.1 kB or 13% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eeingleton.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.0 kB or 18% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (64%)
73
26
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EE Ingleton. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
eeingleton.co.uk
167 ms
eeingleton.co.uk
420 ms
front.min.css
79 ms
sbttb-fonts.css
158 ms
smooth-back-to-top-button.css
232 ms
style.min.css
233 ms
theme.min.css
234 ms
header-footer.min.css
234 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
236 ms
post-12.css
244 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
308 ms
swiper.min.css
309 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
310 ms
global.css
311 ms
post-68.css
314 ms
post-454.css
316 ms
post-557.css
384 ms
fontawesome.min.css
463 ms
solid.min.css
386 ms
regular.min.css
385 ms
front.min.js
391 ms
jquery.min.js
475 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
462 ms
js
69 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
473 ms
widget-call-to-action.min.css
472 ms
widget-icon-box.min.css
472 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
628 ms
widget-loop-builder.min.css
626 ms
animations.min.css
637 ms
e-gallery.min.css
638 ms
post-576.css
638 ms
smooth-back-to-top-button.js
638 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
639 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
639 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
640 ms
e-gallery.min.js
640 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
640 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
680 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
625 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
549 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
473 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
470 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
476 ms
hooks.min.js
481 ms
i18n.min.js
531 ms
frontend.min.js
532 ms
waypoints.min.js
467 ms
core.min.js
471 ms
frontend.min.js
472 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
482 ms
EE-Ingleton-Engineering-Logo.svg
477 ms
ee_Ingleton_engineering_limited_-dsc7821b.jpg
627 ms
repeated-dots-left.svg
323 ms
ee_ingleton_metal_staircase_infill_panels_cardiff-cathedral-3.jpg
404 ms
ee_ingleton_animal_feed_milling_900x900_DSC7882.jpg
409 ms
ee_Ingleton_engineering_other_screens_900x900_DSC7952.jpg
422 ms
ee_Ingleton_engineering_limited_-dsc7999.jpg
705 ms
ee_ingleton_animal_feed_milling_dsc7986.jpg
635 ms
ee_ingleton_engineering900x900_DSC7857.jpg
563 ms
ee_Ingleton_granulator_screens_900x900_DSC7966.jpg
501 ms
ee_Ingleton_engineering_other_screens_900x900_DSC7955.jpg
553 ms
ee_ingleton_engineering900x900_DSC7800.jpg
482 ms
ee_ingleton_metal_staircase_infill_panels_14.jpg
521 ms
ee_ingleton_engineering_picperf_P1030696.jpg
532 ms
ee_ingleton_engineering_picperf_deb900x900.jpg
550 ms
perforated_metal_cladding_panels_meadowhall-11a.jpg
590 ms
resized-image-Promo-10.jpg
759 ms
SME-EE-INGLETON.png
676 ms
architectural-perforated-applications-victory-pier-11-1.jpg
684 ms
EE-Engineering-Footer-Logo-Optimised.svg
627 ms
ee-iso-9001-2015-badge-grey-web.png
665 ms
ee-iso-14001-2015-badge-grey-web.png
666 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
702 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
689 ms
wpxpress.ttf
688 ms
ee_Ingleton_engineering_limited_-dsc0002.jpg
702 ms
repoeated-dots-bottom.svg
713 ms
eeingleton.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
eeingleton.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
eeingleton.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eeingleton.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eeingleton.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eeingleton.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of EE Ingleton. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: