Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

efootage.com

eFootage - Exclusive Stock Film & Video for Production

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

346 ms

Resources Loaded

858 ms

Page Rendered

106 ms

efootage.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing EFootage content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about efootage.com

eFootage is a collection of unique film and video on demand. A variety of film and video, current and historical, are avaiable for licensing

Visit efootage.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Efootage.com page load time and found that the first response time was 346 ms and then it took 964 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

efootage.com performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

59/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

37/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.5 s

89/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value650 ms

46/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.15

76/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.6 s

81/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

efootage.com

346 ms

plusone.js

62 ms

widgets.js

15 ms

in.js

19 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

45 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 18% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Efootage.com, 21% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 8% (3 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (346 ms) belongs to the original domain Efootage.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 58.1 kB (36%)

Content Size

161.1 kB

After Optimization

103.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Efootage.com main page is 161.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 59.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 33.2 kB

  • Original 42.0 kB
  • After minification 39.7 kB
  • After compression 8.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 679 B

  • Original 59.4 kB
  • After minification 58.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. EFootage images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 19.4 kB

  • Original 54.0 kB
  • After minification 47.3 kB
  • After compression 34.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 19.4 kB or 36% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 4.8 kB

  • Original 5.6 kB
  • After minification 4.6 kB
  • After compression 844 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Efootage.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.8 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (62%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

14

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EFootage. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

efootage.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

efootage.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

efootage.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1252

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Efootage.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Efootage.com main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of EFootage. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: