2.4 sec in total
101 ms
1.2 sec
1.1 sec
Welcome to egate.ws homepage info - get ready to check Egate best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about egate.ws
Visit egate.wsWe analyzed Egate.ws page load time and found that the first response time was 101 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
egate.ws performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
75/100
10%
Value3.5 s
62/100
25%
Value3.0 s
94/100
10%
Value180 ms
92/100
30%
Value0.425
22/100
15%
Value6.1 s
63/100
10%
101 ms
208 ms
94 ms
154 ms
104 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Egate.ws, 24% (17 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 10% (7 requests) were made to Blogger.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (208 ms) belongs to the original domain Egate.ws.
Page size can be reduced by 427.5 kB (42%)
1.0 MB
580.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Egate.ws main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 392.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 166.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 166.8 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Egate images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 217.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 217.4 kB or 57% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Egate.ws needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 29.5 kB or 67% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (48%)
64
33
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Egate. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
egate.ws
101 ms
www.egate.ws
208 ms
2973171168-css_bundle_v2.css
94 ms
authorization.css
154 ms
plusone.js
104 ms
infolinks_main.js
66 ms
310590189-widgets.js
145 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
180 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
180 ms
google_top_exp.js
176 ms
gradients_light.png
169 ms
icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
168 ms
GATE%2B2015%2BEDC%2B-%2B2.JPG
166 ms
GATE%2B2015%2BEDC%2B-%2B4.JPG
166 ms
GATE%2B2015%2BEDC%2B-%2B5.JPG
162 ms
GATE%2B2015%2BEDC%2B-%2B13.JPG
159 ms
icon18_edit_allbkg.gif
153 ms
user_sync.html
117 ms
usersyncup-an.html
112 ms
ice.js
175 ms
GATE%2B2015%2BEDC%2B-%2B11.JPG
114 ms
GATE%2BEC%2Bimage%2Bplay%2Bstore.png
119 ms
share_buttons_20_3.png
105 ms
GATE%2B2015%2BEDC%2B-%2B6.JPG
112 ms
GATE%2B2015%2BEDC%2B-%2B20.JPG
116 ms
GATE%2B2015%2BEDC%2B-%2B22.JPG
114 ms
GATE%2Bandroid%2Bapp%2B2.JPG
113 ms
GATE%2B2015%2BEDC%2B-%2B12.JPG
111 ms
GATE%2B2015%2BEDC%2B-%2B17.JPG
115 ms
GATE%2B2015%2BEDC%2B-%2B21.JPG
112 ms
GATE%2BAnalog%2Bimage%2Bplay%2Bstore.png
114 ms
body_gradient_tile_light.png
99 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_2
42 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_3
91 ms
fastbutton
104 ms
fastbutton
193 ms
showad.js
77 ms
blank.html
60 ms
navbar.g
167 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_4
110 ms
PugMaster
125 ms
rs=AGLTcCNA4EXafLDGojegodqz7l3UCs3MUg
93 ms
postmessageRelay
162 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
74 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
75 ms
pixel
52 ms
Pug
56 ms
usersync.aspx
46 ms
icons_peach.png
114 ms
platform:gapi.iframes.style.common.js
86 ms
arrows-light.png
123 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
142 ms
api.js
86 ms
core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js
130 ms
2536007149-postmessagerelay.js
93 ms
pixel
39 ms
generic
42 ms
Pug
43 ms
Pug
49 ms
Pug
43 ms
Pug
43 ms
Pug
41 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
41 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
32 ms
fastbutton
100 ms
Pug
25 ms
postmessageRelay
28 ms
pixel
11 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
10 ms
306752634-lightbox_bundle.css
14 ms
1962929759-lbx__en_gb.js
48 ms
egate.ws accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
egate.ws best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
egate.ws SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Egate.ws can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Egate.ws main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
egate.ws
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Egate. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: