2.9 sec in total
812 ms
1.9 sec
148 ms
Click here to check amazing Eget content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about eget.link
Nothing is impossible!!!
Visit eget.linkWe analyzed Eget.link page load time and found that the first response time was 812 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
eget.link performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
26/100
10%
Value3.8 s
54/100
25%
Value6.5 s
38/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.8 s
89/100
10%
812 ms
129 ms
131 ms
25 ms
160 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Eget.link, 42% (20 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 25% (12 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (812 ms) belongs to the original domain Eget.link.
Page size can be reduced by 104.8 kB (38%)
277.4 kB
172.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Eget.link main page is 277.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 138.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 6.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.1 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Eget images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 92.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 92.3 kB or 67% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (55%)
44
20
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eget. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
eget.link
812 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
129 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
131 ms
css
25 ms
style.css
160 ms
jquery.js
240 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
124 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
165 ms
navigation.js
206 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
210 ms
divider.png
122 ms
Easy-Way-of-Making-Money-with-Pay-per-Install-PPI-150x150.jpg
95 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
9 ms
nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf
22 ms
DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf
22 ms
likebox.php
277 ms
kyEKgjk51ZE.css
86 ms
xgj7bXhJNEH.css
106 ms
kE_Z8j4XNUS.css
125 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
175 ms
FJmpeSpHpjS.js
192 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
142 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
146 ms
OloiM1PZafe.js
147 ms
LTv6ZK-5zxz.js
206 ms
1FCa-btixu2.js
191 ms
Oagsvfb4VWi.js
204 ms
pObvZSrFc_4.js
203 ms
Kt4tkgSRvHH.js
204 ms
H3EKDTObx05.js
234 ms
eR-qA8bp1RM.js
235 ms
11048613_1062032783814145_5533149552112772790_n.png
255 ms
10441393_1062031340480956_6727278075709604684_n.jpg
336 ms
11200896_1630633923833371_5301309400298273518_n.jpg
309 ms
10247264_675568485830909_6971468296040158626_n.jpg
308 ms
12814161_1583273871995049_7986513829018264361_n.jpg
306 ms
12548915_1685390795045377_4165848382458529417_n.jpg
310 ms
16371_866010610125004_6563321895897344854_n.jpg
308 ms
10391530_1192338790778839_1825776053471207504_n.jpg
325 ms
11825832_722379504574767_8630366944576333284_n.jpg
326 ms
18388_843047569082751_194534466839520510_n.jpg
322 ms
10354686_10150004552801856_220367501106153455_n.jpg
325 ms
2503_10207291961870786_301537538828858966_n.jpg
326 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
81 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
80 ms
gxbPuQdXIZP.png
20 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
19 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
37 ms
eget.link accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
eget.link best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
eget.link SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ZH
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eget.link can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Eget.link main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eget.link
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Eget. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: