1.4 sec in total
105 ms
1.2 sec
80 ms
Click here to check amazing Egistix content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about egistix.com
Visit egistix.comWe analyzed Egistix.com page load time and found that the first response time was 105 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
egistix.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
81/100
10%
Value4.8 s
31/100
25%
Value2.5 s
97/100
10%
Value420 ms
65/100
30%
Value0.592
11/100
15%
Value8.6 s
37/100
10%
105 ms
70 ms
70 ms
65 ms
191 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Egistix.com, 36% (15 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 29% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (563 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 383.3 kB (47%)
807.7 kB
424.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Egistix.com main page is 807.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 420.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 250.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 250.6 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 130.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Egistix needs image optimization as it can save up to 130.0 kB or 31% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (38%)
26
16
The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Egistix. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.egistix.com
105 ms
minified.js
70 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
70 ms
polyfill.min.js
65 ms
thunderbolt-commons.0c1b09d9.bundle.min.js
191 ms
main.6ee538dd.bundle.min.js
198 ms
lodash.min.js
197 ms
react.production.min.js
191 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
197 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
193 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
196 ms
11062b_03c50f8fe4a34cc297a984e483a282eff000.jpg
147 ms
bundle.min.js
165 ms
egistix_1700x1700_big-e_01.png
282 ms
3b1f25_d88613295c5b40228989d68404f6dff7.png
100 ms
Egistix-2_0_02.png
395 ms
playtime17_1.png
334 ms
egistix-oil_01.png
377 ms
egistix-open_bigger.png
358 ms
egistix-gas_bigger.png
374 ms
egistix%20-%20logo.png
547 ms
Tradefloor.png
563 ms
egistix_1700x1700_big-e_01.png
471 ms
opensans-regular-webfont.woff
13 ms
opensans-bold-webfont.woff
25 ms
cca525a8-ad89-43ae-aced-bcb49fb271dc.woff
11 ms
157 ms
147 ms
146 ms
144 ms
141 ms
135 ms
186 ms
181 ms
174 ms
176 ms
168 ms
174 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
8 ms
bolt-performance
46 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
17 ms
right-arrow.svg
15 ms
egistix.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
egistix.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
egistix.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Egistix.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Egistix.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
egistix.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Egistix. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: