Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

ehealthspider.com

EhealthSpider: Health, Beauty and Lifestyle Blog UK, USA

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

79 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

537 ms

ehealthspider.com screenshot

About Website

Visit ehealthspider.com now to see the best up-to-date Ehealth Spider content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ehealthspider.com

Ehealth Spider UK is a Health, Beauty and Lifestyle Blog for Public. Write For Us About Health, Fitness and Wellness Articles For Public Health Tips.

Visit ehealthspider.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ehealthspider.com page load time and found that the first response time was 79 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ehealthspider.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

ehealthspider.com

79 ms

www.ehealthspider.com

193 ms

css

154 ms

css

169 ms

3375562265-css_bundle_v2.css

150 ms

Our browser made a total of 114 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Ehealthspider.com, 7% (8 requests) were made to 1.bp.blogspot.com and 6% (7 requests) were made to Image2.pubmatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (443 ms) relates to the external source Google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 884.7 kB (41%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Ehealthspider.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 199.5 kB

  • Original 258.4 kB
  • After minification 256.3 kB
  • After compression 58.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 199.5 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 35.9 kB

  • Original 801.6 kB
  • After minification 765.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ehealth Spider images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 628.3 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 437.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 628.3 kB or 59% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 21.0 kB

  • Original 43.2 kB
  • After minification 43.1 kB
  • After compression 22.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ehealthspider.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 21.0 kB or 49% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (48%)

Requests Now

103

After Optimization

54

The browser has sent 103 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ehealth Spider. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

ehealthspider.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ehealthspider.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ehealthspider.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ehealth Spider. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: