3.6 sec in total
10 ms
3.4 sec
217 ms
Visit ejeeva.com now to see the best up-to-date EJeeva content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ejeeva.com
At Ejeeva, we want to provide your company with the business solutions you need to operate and efficient and effective business, so we offer you a wide range of software solutions, including eCommerce...
Visit ejeeva.comWe analyzed Ejeeva.com page load time and found that the first response time was 10 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
ejeeva.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
28/100
10%
Value12.9 s
0/100
25%
Value12.1 s
4/100
10%
Value3,160 ms
2/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value20.9 s
1/100
10%
10 ms
2366 ms
56 ms
60 ms
104 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Ejeeva.com, 14% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Ejeeva.com.
Page size can be reduced by 248.0 kB (20%)
1.2 MB
972.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Ejeeva.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 661.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 69.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 120 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. EJeeva images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 88.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 88.7 kB or 13% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 89.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ejeeva.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 89.6 kB or 37% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (82%)
50
9
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EJeeva. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ejeeva.com
10 ms
ejeeva.com
2366 ms
webfont.js
56 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
60 ms
style.min.css
104 ms
classic-themes.min.css
64 ms
styles.css
66 ms
settings.css
81 ms
js_composer.min.css
169 ms
custom.css
67 ms
bootstrap.min.css
108 ms
font-awesome.min.css
72 ms
simple-line-icons.min.css
74 ms
owl-carousel.min.css
75 ms
magnific-popup.min.css
78 ms
media-element.min.css
84 ms
image-hover.min.css
97 ms
ytplayer.min.css
87 ms
animate.min.css
92 ms
style.css
125 ms
shortcode.css
135 ms
theme_1.css
112 ms
css
56 ms
jquery.min.js
118 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
113 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
144 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
133 ms
index.js
121 ms
index.js
131 ms
gtm4wp-contact-form-7-tracker.js
131 ms
gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js
131 ms
theme.min.js
249 ms
theme.js
142 ms
api.js
70 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
131 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
138 ms
index.js
137 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
140 ms
css
47 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
190 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
190 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
374 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
374 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
374 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf
374 ms
5aU19_a8oxmIfJpbERySiA.ttf
376 ms
uK_x4riEZv4o1w9ptjIHPd-c.ttf
487 ms
uK_y4riEZv4o1w9hDRcX.ttf
487 ms
gtm.js
357 ms
logo2.png
165 ms
banner1.jpg
333 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
268 ms
Simple-Line-Icons.woff
84 ms
recaptcha__en.js
357 ms
revolution.extension.video.min.js
190 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
191 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
256 ms
analytics.js
199 ms
iframe_api
171 ms
loader.gif
127 ms
collect
18 ms
js
55 ms
www-widgetapi.js
7 ms
ejeeva.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
ejeeva.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
ejeeva.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ejeeva.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ejeeva.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ejeeva.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of EJeeva. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: