Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

electric-fence.co.uk

Electric Fencing | High Quality | electric-fence.co.uk

Page Load Speed

6.7 sec in total

First Response

315 ms

Resources Loaded

5.9 sec

Page Rendered

547 ms

electric-fence.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Electric Fence content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about electric-fence.co.uk

Professional electric fencing equipment with high quality. A large product range and save £££. Save even more on bundles and B-stock. Over 1500 electric f…

Visit electric-fence.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Electric-fence.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 315 ms and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

electric-fence.co.uk performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.9 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,040 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.18

67/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.2 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

electric-fence.co.uk

315 ms

electric-fence.co.uk

404 ms

www.electric-fence.co.uk

1667 ms

cmp.min.css

391 ms

cookiecmp.js

340 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Electric-fence.co.uk, 24% (11 requests) were made to Media.electric-fence.co.uk and 4% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.consentmanager.mgr.consensu.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) relates to the external source Media.electric-fence.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 623.9 kB (68%)

Content Size

921.4 kB

After Optimization

297.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Electric-fence.co.uk main page is 921.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 678.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 618.4 kB

  • Original 678.9 kB
  • After minification 507.0 kB
  • After compression 60.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 171.9 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 618.4 kB or 91% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.8 kB

  • Original 209.0 kB
  • After minification 206.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Electric Fence images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 33.5 kB
  • After minification 33.4 kB
  • After compression 30.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (66%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

13

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Electric Fence. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

electric-fence.co.uk accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

electric-fence.co.uk best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

electric-fence.co.uk SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Electric-fence.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Electric-fence.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Electric Fence. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: